(I did, of course, mean Ar*ch*Comm there, yes. Thanks to those of you who pointed it out.)
On 28 January 2016 at 19:07, Alex Monk <kren...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 28 January 2016 at 18:53, Rob Lanphier <ro...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > >> This is especially true given that ArchComm really has absolutely no say >> > in resourcing and a given feature may not have secured funding (people, >> > hardware etc.) >> > >> >> Awww....you're mail was so great, and then you ended with this! Are you >> saying that the only real power in this world belongs to people with >> control of the money? > > > He wouldn't be the only one who thinks this. I've seen other people with > similar concerns about whether ArbComm is really in control or whether WMF > management is, because it's WMF management that actually gets to decide > what the paid Wikimedia developers (probably the majority of active > developers at this point) work on. I'm inclined to agree with them. > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
