Hi all, I am not sure what you mean by native, but the SecureW2 TTLS Client has been ported successfully to Vista and will be released soon as a BETA.
In an early experiment with SecureW2 I have also implemented the server side of TTLS in IAS (Windows 2K). I left it alone as I figured no one would be interested. Regards, Tom Rixom SecureW2 > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Jonn Martell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: donderdag 8 februari 2007 22:05 > Aan: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU > Onderwerp: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Desire for Windows native TTLSv0 > > Having TTLS support in Windows would be great. It would make so much > sense for implementers. It would be a miracle really! I'm all for it. > > Call me skeptical but I don't see it happening. I participated in the > IEEE working groups a few years back and had the opportunity to ask > that specific questions to some of the key Microsoft engineers working > on the stacks. At that time, it was an *absolute* NO - if that has > changed, great but I see no indication of Microsoft doing it. As of > December 2006, the official word from > http://www.microsoft.com/technet/network/ias/iasfaq.mspx is "Microsoft > does not plan to support Tunneled TTLS." > > In my opinion, the only way it would appear in Windows is if they saw > market share loss to another desktop OS because of lack of EAP-TTLS > support. Last time I visited the local computer stores a few days ago, > I found it hard to find a laptop that had Windows XP, let alone other > types of OS - they are all Vista! > > I admire our friends in Europe and their support for TTLS and cross > edu roaming with eduroam. > > But having years of experience supporting clients, the last thing I > would advise an EDU client to do is support a 3rd party client on > Microsoft. One patch can ruin your day and users would blame "your" > 3rd party app. Not that I don't trust Microsoft... In an environment > as diverse EDUs, it's a little scary to support 3rd party apps. So > far, I've been a supporter of doing the work on the back end to > support PEAP (MS-Chapv2) > > As for supporting PEAP - there's is always a way to do it but it's not > always pretty :-) I call be being a "Microsoft compatible" backend. > :-) > > As for inventing and supporting other EAP types - oh goodness - no... > I think we already have a good "collection" to do almost all the > things we need to do :-) > > ... Jonn Martell, Martell Consulting, [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.martell.ca > > On 2/8/07, Walt Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In a conversation I had with Microsoft, it was implied that if there is > > a demand for it, Microsoft would add TTLSv0 into the native Vista OS. > > > > Since there is a lot of talk on the EAP types today, I thought I would > > post my own question. How many of you out there would like to have > > TTLSv0 native within Windows. > > > > Many out there will of course be using PEAP. But for those out there > > that don't, or can't, please let me know. > > > > As a secondary question, who would be interested if there was some sort > > of Kerberos EAP (not TTLS with PAP). > > > > Thanks. > > > > -- > > Walt Reynolds > > Principle Systems Security Development Engineer > > Information Technology Central Services > > University of Michigan > > (734) 615-9438 > > > > ********** > > Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent > Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. > > > > ********** > Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent > Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.