The Wiki should be changed to "EAP-GTC is protected by the PEAP TLS tunnel".
Isn't the reason one would use GTC is to support secure token cards and OTP? Too bad Microsoft decided not to support this... (Now why would Microsoft want to support only MS-CHAPv2? Hummm... :-) It's interesting to see that Cisco latest CCX specification (v4) now adds support for "Microsoft standard" PEAP. http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/pr46/pr147/program_additional_information_new_release_features.html Unfortunately, it's missing support for EAP-TTLS... ... Jonn Martell, Martell Consulting, www.martell.ca On 2/9/07, Frank Bulk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
According to this wiki, EAP-GTC "does not protect the authentication data in any way." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Authentication_Protocol#PEAPv1.2FEAP -GTC It's like PAP in that way, but why use EAP-GTC if PAP is more popular? Frank -----Original Message----- From: Emerson Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 09, 2007 3:38 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] EAP GTC Why not use this instead of PAP for LDAP and other databases? ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
