Walt,

Good point about the EAP method.

Matt,

Because we have to authenticate several different users, we HAD to use EAP-TTLS. This is probably where you will have to do most of your research. In this case, there aren't really any wrong ways of doing things. You just have to make an educated decision as to what is best for you, and move forward.

Thanks.

Jorge Bodden

Walt Howd wrote:
We're doing 802.1x with LWAPP. We have two controllers, 300 APs and average around 1100 concurrent wireless users. We just switched to 802.1x authentication last year, with great success. Previously we ran a network with just WEP and MAC address registration. Last summer we brought a new wireless network up on the controllers supporting WPA1 and WPA2 with TKIP and AES enabled. We then turned on a captive portal on the legacy network that redirected users to a website containing information on the new network and a switch over date. The users could choose to see the directions on how to switch, or continue using legacy network up until the switchover deadline.

A big factor in the 802.1x puzzle that will determine the success of your project is your EAP method. We chose PEAPv0 as it had the greatest compatibility in our environment and lowest overhead. Hope this helps!

Walt

On Jul 24, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Jenkins, Matthew wrote:

How many others are doing 802.1x in a Cisco LWAPP environment? Have you had success with it, or would you recommend another route for authentication? Currently we are using VPNs over our secure wireless and I am investigating whether we would be ahead to start using 802.1x coupled with WPA. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Thanks, Matt *Matthew Jenkins
*Network/Server Administrator
Fairmont State University
Visit us online at www.fairmontstate.edu <http://www.fairmontstate.edu/>
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.



--------------------

This electronic message is intended to be for the use only of the named 
recipient, and may contain information that is confidential or privileged.  If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this message is 
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in error or are not the 
named recipient, please notify us immediately by contacting the sender at the 
electronic mail address noted above, and delete and destroy all copies of this 
message.  Thank you.



**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to