No easy answer. The dorms could be set up “consumer style” with a different 
operational profile, SSID, etc and don’t HAVE to be run like the rest of campus.

But in classrooms, labs and meeting rooms there is now way to deliver highest 
performance, regulatory compliance, and accommodation of crap devices all at 
the same time without hyper complexity, and then at the physics level you still 
have problems.

Even if every issue can’t be fixed in one fell swoop, there are a number of 
easy tweaks that device makers could provide if they pulled their heads out of 
2004.

Lee Badman
Wireless/Network Architect
ITS, Syracuse University
315.443.3003
(Blog: http://wirednot.wordpress.com)

From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Sessler
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 12:39 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Trying to get the Wi-Fi Alliance's Attention

I don't know Lee, in my mind is it the device maker's requirements to work in 
both consumer and enterprise environment, or does the enterprise wlan market 
need to figure out how to look more like a consumer wlan? Is this a problem 
EDU's have created because of some desire to provide a service that's more 
complex or invasive to use then it has to be? Is there really a need to 
on-board devices and have them associate using WPA2 Ent, or could we support 
the bulk of our users (especially students) using something more consumer 
friendly?

Take residential (dorm) wifi as an example. If you had a model with an open or 
PSK-emulated wireless network coupled with location-based service filtering, 
the user gets on with every device out there, and they can see their 
chromecast, appletv, etc. and any others on that AP or 1 adjacent. Pretty much 
gives you the consumer feel.

Jeff

>>> On Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 11:47 AM, in message 
>>> <432756068f5346b59e108b825efca...@ex13-mbx-10.ad.syr.edu<mailto:432756068f5346b59e108b825efca...@ex13-mbx-10.ad.syr.edu>>,
>>>  Lee H Badman <lhbad...@syr.edu<mailto:lhbad...@syr.edu>> wrote:

I know self-promotion is in poor taste, but wanted to share this



http://www.networkcomputing.com/wireless-infrastructure/the-case-for-wlan-interoperability/a/d-id/1318718?​



and encourage anyone of like (or opposing) mind to add comments. I'm told that 
the Alliance is at least reading along, FWIW.



-Lee


Lee H. Badman
Network Architect/Wireless TME
ITS, Syracuse University
315.443.3003

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to