hmmm....almost sounds like micro$oft.....kill the competition by generating own interference = less external interference.
G. Tim Pozar wrote: > Unfortunately, since FH has a higher dwell time than DS it will tend > to cause more interference with other devices such as video over > FM like television ENG uses. > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 08:56:37AM -0700, David T. Witkowski wrote: > >>FYI on the subject of FH versus DS, here's a paper by a schoolmate of >>mine which describes how FH is interference-resistive: >> >> http://www.tropian.com/tech/tech_docs/sscompare.pdf >> >>...dtw > > -- > general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> > [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
