I don't understand Tim's comment: > Unfortunately, since FH has a higher dwell time than > DS it will tend to cause more interference with > other devices such as video over FM like television > ENG uses.
Shouldn't the "dwell time" of DS be however long you leave the device turned on, since it always occupies the same frequencies? I can imagine that DS causes less interference with other users because you can choose to set your DS channel away from other users' channels, whereas FH will hit everybody's channel over time. The dwell time of 802.11 FH might be longer than the that of other hoppers, like bluetooth (I'm pretty sure the 802.11 is adjustable, up to pretty long dwells), which might also cause more noticeable interference to other users. John __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
