I"m not on that list.
sorry,
marlon

----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Shoemaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fw: [WISP] Sort of OT: Long list of answers...


Could you forward along the Motorola thread as well for comparison?  Thanks.

Patrick


Marlon K. Schafer wrote:

I found this thread interesting.

Enjoy,
marlon

----- Original Message ----- From: Patrick Leary To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 5:51 PM
Subject: [WISP] Sort of OT: Long list of answers...


So a gent on the P15 Moto list asked a huge number of questions about Canopy. I thought it would be very interesting to attempt to answer them from a VL perspective. Since it took a ton of time, I wanted to get some use out them. Excellent questions actually. Pretty darned thorough.



Patrick Leary AVP WISP Markets Alvarion, Inc. o: 650.314.2628 c: 760.580.0080 Vonage: 650.641.1243 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Are modifications to the APs FCC legal?

No, but we numerous 3rd party sectors sectors certified that may e used. Our sectors range from 60, 90, and 120 degrees, plus omni choices (God forbid!)

 How wide are the 5.7 AP channels, is this adjustable?  What would a SA
 show the channel width to be?

Yes, 10 or 20 MHz wide. You can also change on the fly and all CPE will adjust automatically.

 What is the real-world distance achieved in a LOS situation without
 reflector, with?

The CPE with VL comes with an integrated antenna which enables on the VL to reach about 7 miles LOS at full capacity (32mbps net ftp), 16mbps at 5 miles, 29mbps at 2 miles and 32mbps at 1 mile. The answer BTW to your Canopy question can be found on their doc CNPY-ADV-SUBMODFCT brochure produced in 2006. On that doc it says the range of the 5.7 w/o reflector is 14mbps to 1 mile and 7mbps to 2 miles. Beyond that you must have a reflector. With the reflect you get 14mbps to 5 miles and 7mbps to 10 miles.

 Are there any tools or utilities that Motorola or other offers to assist
 in the network development of Canopy products?

There are things like link calculators, channel plan docs, and plenty of opportunity for direct consultation.

 Can two SMs on the same AP talk to each other without special routing?

In VL it could be enabled via the many VLAN capabilities, which include QinQ VLAN support, but VL intentionally does not allow this out of the box (it is something the operator, i.e. you, should have control over.)

 Explain how the Advantage 14MB/s (or 20MB/s) works, how is that
 allocated, how true are those figures?  Is the allocation dynamic?  Can
 you mix breeds of SM on the AP?

VL uses OFDM, which gives it some NLOS abilities (not so much with trees, but it also helps a bit there). The OFDM we uses adaptive modulates (dynamic) to maintain the best connection. Each mod level down is a lower rate. You can also set the radio to fix on a modulation level if you wish. All VL CPE versions work seamlessly together in any sector.

 Can an SM access the AP it's on for management?

 In VL the operator can assign multiple stations for management access.

 Is there a feature to disable broadcast traffic?

Yes, VL has a "broadcast rate limiting" feature which can be set per subscriber. It can also send you a trap if any set station nears its limit.

 Why can't the APs use horizontal polarization?  Doesn't this limit the
 radio's ability to co-locate?

The CPEs now have an option (in the rev E version hardware) to be either H or V pol mounted. The AUs can be mounted either way (by way of antenna choice).

 Why is the latency so high for the APs (5-7ms)?

N/A, but looking in terms of a specific application, the delay with the optional "WLP" (wireless link prioritization feature) feature is stable at 4 or less ms.


 What is the maximum PPS per AP?

 Up to about 60000 downstream and 48000 upstream.

 Are there any tools to prevent or reduce the impact from an end-user
 launching a DoS attack?

Yes, the broadcast rate limiting feature was designed specifically because of this threat.

 How do the APs handle VoIP traffic?  Is there anything that can assist
 this?

Better, literally, than any other AP in unlicensed, with up 288 CONCURRENT VoIP calls per AP (we call them AUs) with a MOS of better than 4.0. With the WLP feature implemented, MOS is typically over 4.1 and many tests show over 4.4. (I have some great VoIP graphs). We can also run tons of concurrent data. The graphs show this too.
 What is a realistic number of concurrent VoIP sessions an AP can handle?

VL is the only product that can literally and dynamically prioritize VoIP over the entire pipe and across the entire sector (versus just dedicating a partition that must be allocated whether used or not). At the same time, VL has a starvation prevention mechanism to prevent starvation of low priority traffic.

 Are there any known problems with over-polling an AP with SNMP?

We do not use polling. In our view it is less efficient than our implementation.

 Are the SMs SNMP capable, or only the data from a SM through the AP?

 Yes, if set to be one of the management consoles.

 What improvements over the current APs does Motorola hope to achieve in
 the next generation?

VL was launched in 2002. Then it only netted about 12mbps. It now nets 32mbps. Many features have been added, such as 4th gen CIR/MIR, broadcast rate limiting, VoIP from 40 calls per sector to 288, pps from about 3,000 to what I noted above, etc., etc. This has always been done with backward compatibility. (I can't yet name specific new features as v4.0 and rev E are both already new.)

 Since Canopy's inception has there been an upgrade to the AP that was
 not backwards compatible with existing SMs?

 Never. VL has always supported backward compatibility.

 Is a Lite SM the same hardware as a regular SM?

We have no such animal. We have real VL CPE (rev E 3mbps version) for only $285/ea (all inclusive) under the AlvarionCOMNET program (that's with a 25/CPE per quarter commitment).

 Can lite SMs be purchased individually?

 All CPE can be bought individually or in packs.

 What is the benefit to using a SM other than the lite?

 N/A

 Can a non-advantage AP be software upgraded to Advantage?

N/A. But we do offer a limited association AU (designed for rural markets). It can be upgraded to a full AU.


 What is the voltage pin out on Canopy equipment for PoE, is positive on
 pins 7 and 8 or 4 and 5?
I'm not an engineer (or sales VP either actually), but I believe it is 54vDC. Off hand I'm not sure which pin, but I can found out if you really want to know.


 What voltage range can the Canopy accept?  (Min, Max)

VL can be powered with -48vDC or AC (the IDU side - indoor unit - ranges from 85-265 vAC with 50-60 Hz).

 How does GPS sync work?

VL does not need sync in our view. Our channels do not bleed near the extent of certain other brands (as per a large such user tells me). We also have very high capacity so we do not need the kind of re-use some require on the same tower and planning between cells is fairly straight forward. We also use higher end antennas (MTI) on both ends and with some FCC-legal 3rd party antenna options on the AU side. We also use dynamic ATPC so our radios do not talk beyond their connections.

 What benefits does the CMM offer over the syncpipe?   Is the satellite
 management necessary?

 N/A

 What level of tolerance is acceptable with GPS sync?  Can the GPS sync
 cable length add delay?

 N/A

 How many GPS units are required for a network?  Can the GPS data be sent
 via the wireless to other towers?

 N/A

 If my network is GPS synced, and my competitor's network is GPS synced,
 are they in harmony or do we have to coordinate our efforts on GPS sync
 specific settings to reduce interference?
 N/A


 How do the APs handle interference?  What methods to they use?
VLs are hugely configurable, but some of the key things are use of smaller channels, tighter antennas (10 degrees on the CPE). OFDM's adaptively sliding modulations, adjustments to various parameters, etc.


 Is there a RF receive threshold that can be set?  How fine is the
 adjustment of this setting?  Does it exist on both the AP and SM or just
 one?

20 - 4,032 byes (both ends) with a default of 60 for SUs and 4032 for AUs.
 What is the process of changing a channel on the AP?  How do the SMs
 know the new channel to change to?

 Simple, a few keystokes. SU's change automatically.

 Are there broadcast commands that can be sent to all SMs on an
 particular AP?  Or all SMs on the network?

 Yes and yes.

 Does the Canopy support ARQ?

 Yes, VL does ARQ.

 Explain what Transmit Frame Spreading is, what are the pros and cons?
 N/A


 Explain the 1x and 2x options, what are the pros and cons?
 N/A


 Where are the SMs authentication information (MAC, etc.) stored at?  AP
 level?  If an AP fails, what is involved with replacing that AP and
 restoring the SMs?  Are there any backup utilities to assist?

MAC table. If an AU fails and the "best AU" setting is enabled the CPEs will automatically re-associate to the next best AU. All CPE and AUs have a shadow flash and different firmware can be stored on each flash, this is invaluable if for some reason an upgrade fails in process. We are the only ones with shadow flash (that I know of). AUs can also be deployed stand alone or as part of a chassis system with blades. In the chassis configuration supports redundant power and you can swap IDUs should an IDU fail.


 Explain how canopy (not db) RSSI value is calculated?

We do not do RSSI, we do SNR and it is hardcoded, but the 10 SNR LEDs on the CPE directly correspond to a specific SNR number.

 What exactly is the definition of Jitter?  Explain how jitter is
 calculated?

Jitter is just not something that we have to deal with in VL except with respect to VoIP and other real time sensitive apps. Our VoIP jitter using WLP is under 3ms. A good definition though can be found via this link: http://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid7_gci213534,00.html. Discussion of jitter is not in the manual and I have never heard it discussed among VL users in any forums. I believe it is a non-issue on the data side.


 Explain how the test link function works, why is it disruptive to the
 entire AP?

 N/A

 What must be changed from default values on an SM to begin the survey
 process?

N/A. Nothing, on AU or SU end. Once the survey is over the system will revert to its previous configuration.

 What is the suggested method of validating a new installation - what
 parameters should be measured?
Again, I am not an engineer, but you'd certainly want to validate the quality of the link relative to the pre-installed expectation, so you really just need to pass traffic via your preferred test method (chariot, etc.). If the quality is not as expected, then you delve into looking at the myriad of counters. Of course, if you are tagging for VLANs you need to validate, as you would anytime you affect any specific setting. Beyond that, I'd defer to my engineers.

 How often is firmware updated?  What is the method of upgrading
 firmware?

Periodically when we can come up some major new thing or per market request. In addition, if needed we provide timely bug fixes to issues found by customers after we can repeat and fix. All upgrades are just a few key strokes and can be down network wide, sector wide or specific set of SUs, all with a few keystrokes. Of course, as mentioned before we have shadow flash.

 How long is the product's warranty, when does that warranty begin, how
 is this proven?

One year, usually from the date it ships from our warehouse, but in recognition of the channel reality, we also have a grace period (flexible).
 How is the RMA process handled?  What is the return time?  Whom do I RMA
 to?

RMAs are processed directly. One VAR is able to process his own I think. It is initiated by online opening of a trouble ticket. It is generally a two-stage process (unless we know the user is highly advanced, where the 1st stage is bypassed). Once the ticket is placed we call back and talk through the issue. We have found in most cases the unit is fine, but the operator had limited knowledge. Should it be determined a return is required, we process it using a credit card number to hold as we ship the new unit before we receive the old unit. Since replacements come from stock, exact time span depends on inventory actually, but most products are commonly kept in inventory.
 If the Prizm is management software necessary for several functions, why
 is there a charge for it?

Our BreezeCONFIG comes with the units and (I'm told) does the things that some brands force payment for, as does other advanced tools. By the way AES is also standard and is hardware embedded so there is no major performance sacrifice to implement it.


 If the Prizm software crashes, do SMs lose their license for the
 duration of the outage?

 N/A

 Can the Prizm software only allocate licenses on certain APs with
 licenses?

 N/A

 Why are floating licenses sold instead of just unlocking the unit's full
 capabilities?

 N/A

 What is real-world throughput on a lite 2mb/s floating license? Is that
 aggregate? Can that burst higher?

In our CPE, a 3mbps CPE will (all number here in ftp net) do 3mbps down/2mbps up, a 6mbps CPE will do 6mbps down/4 up and the 54 is wide open to 32mbps should the link budget allow it.

 What is the BAM?

Our "bandwidth allocation module" is not a separate thing. Our MIR and CIR is in the firmware and does not coast extra, it is also dynamic and intelligent.

 When is the WiMax equipment schedule to be delivered?

Which band? We have been shipping some bands since 2004. Maravedis (and no, we don't pay them to say it) says in terms of real WiMAX deployments we have 65% market share. On Feb 14 Motorola said it had 4 WiMAX signed contracts and 23 trials. We have 140 commercial deployments and over 200 other trials as of the end of 2006. The delivery time for UL WiMAX is still not firm, due to complex issues (UL WiMAX may get hosed by other UL until the mechanism being developed in the IEEE 802.16h task group can be ratified and implemented. We chair this TG. Also, the UL WiMAX profile that was developed by the WiMAX Forum is ONLY for 5.725-5.850 GHz, not 5.3 or 5.4. That's a problem. Also the profile is only 802.16d and not 802.16e and that's a bigger problem since the entire weight of the WiMAX ecosystem is being crafted around 16e. So there are things to sort out. I can explain further. We are charter members of the WiMAX Forum and we are number two in executive rank there (under Intel).

 Will the current SMs be compatible with the new WiMax stuff?  How will
 this be possible?

When it finally happens, they will not be able to connect to the same sectors. Don't believe anyone that says they will.unless they remind you it also means a truck roll, which is something all can say. I'm from Missouri on this one and we know WiMAX best (not a boast, just a fact of the market).

 Can Advantage APs be software/hardware upgraded to the future WiMax?

 No.

 What are the main 5.7GHz types of SMs?
 5700, 5750, 5760

3 meg/1 MAC, 6meg/full bridge. 54meg/full bridge - all with integrated antennas (currently 21dBi MTI panel). We also have an "E" model with an N-type connector for support of an external antenna; these are all 54meg full bridges. The hardware rev E version, beginning to ship now (and yes, they live with the others) has a slightly wider antenna (20dBi I think) and support H or V pol mounting.


 Can a 5700 SM be software upgraded to a 5750 SM?

 N/A

 Do you have any Canopy end-users I can contact telephonically to discuss
 the advantages of Canopy over Trango?

Any day. If you want I can make e-mail intros, and I'm talking about users who have done both or might even be large Canopy users now.

 What other third party products can you tell me about?

VL does not need things like Stingers (very nicely done though by Chuck's people at Beehive) or the Cyclone by the Last Mile guys (nice too). The VL already does the things natively (i.e. the line did not have "holes" that 3rd parties had to fill).

 Does Canopy support OFDM?

VL is the market's first UL PMP OFDM product, originally launched in 2002. It remains the most deployed in the world among UL OFDM products.

 Is there a way to force the SM to stay at a certain power level?

We use ATPC (Moto does enable forced TPC). ATPC an also be disabled on ours (though you rarely would).

 Does the SM and AP's handle PPPoE traffic?

We can enable or disable. From the manual: The PPPoE Broadcast Override Filter option enables or disables the broadcasting of PPPoE (Point to Point Protocol over Ethernet) messages. Even if according to the selected option in the Filter Options parameter, broadcast messages should be filtered, PPPoE broadcasts are transmitted if this parameter is set to Enable. We have the following options: Disable - PPPoE Broadcast messages are filtered or transmitted according to the general filtering criteria in the Filter Options parameter. OR: Enable - PPPoE Broadcast messages are transmitted regardless of the selected value of the Filter Options parameter.

 Do the SM and AP allow for firmware to be downgraded if necessary?

 Yes.

 Does Canopy have any plans to implement MPLS?

Not yet. We do pass jumbo frame sizes (for some reason I think this is important with MPLS?)

 How can we monitor the SNR (Live readout of noise level)?

 By physically looking at the LEDs or via telnet or SNMP.

 Are there any utility's or built in tools that the AP or SM have for
 troubleshooting?

BreezeCONFIG has exhaustive trouble shooting means. New users from other brands are usually blown away (again, you can talk to some)


 Do the SM and AP have a log that we can see information about interfaces
 and traffic?

There's a question I do not know the answer to, but I can find out. Obviously not like a packet shaper though.


 Is the throughput at the SM level effected by the RSSI value?

This is true of all wireless products - it is not a brand question and the answer is "Yes."

 Is the throughput at the SM level effected by distance?

 Same as above.


 Yea, that's it for now!  (:

Whew, that took a while. But it was a good exercise for me anyway. I'm happy to say I could answer most without looking at the manual. Not bad for a non-tech.


 Regards,


 Patrick


************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses(190).
************************************************************************************



************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses(42). ************************************************************************************



************************************************************************************ This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses(84). ************************************************************************************





************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************





--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to