On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 01:09 -0400, Michael Erskine wrote: > Rick; > > I think that your opinion is like mine, both informed and experienced. > I am perfectly comfortable with my opinion. And I did not get into an > argument, or even suggest one was somehow a good idea. > > That said, let me also say this. If I don't have to have my router > boards certified without radios because they are not intentional > radiators, then when I add an FCC certified card to them I still don't > have to have them certified because they are still what they were. > > If you tell me that every PC running a pci wireless card has to be > certified then I'll go with suggesting that a single board computer, > which is designed to be a router, should also be certified like all > those PC's otherwise, Rick, I think that both you and Dawn are incorrect.
1) drivers for the wireless card do not allow you to adjust power. 2) comes with a small rubber ducky ant, not a 15db sector. This discussion has come up on this list at probably least a dozen times since I have joined (less than a year ago). MT is not certified, end of chapter. Ask MT they will, most likely, tell you the same thing. > > Like I said, I think your opinion is like mine, both informed and > experienced. I don't think you, or I, or Dawn, have the last word in > this matter and I'd be happy to take the issue up with the FCC to get a > reading from them. > Do this, I would like to read the next chapter, if they can get certified though the PC method, I would take a look at their product. Ryan -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
