what 'protection' do I have as a small wisp? Only want to offer something similar to what my local competition already is.
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:18 PM, David E. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > rabbtux rabbtux wrote: > >> I'm looking into providing a 'family friendly' option to our services. > > At the risk of starting another one of those famous flamewars, is this > (legally speaking) a sound idea? If you start modifying customers' > traffic, even if it's at their request, doesn't that put you at risk of > losing common-carrier protection if someone paying for filtering still > sees naked women or other things they don't want to see? > > I promise this isn't a troll - I really am not too familiar with the law > in this area, aside from the classic cases (Stratton Oakmont vs Prodigy, > Section 230 of the CDA, and so on), and I'm certainly not a lawyer. > > David Smith > MVN.net > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
