On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 23:32 -0700, George Rogato wrote: > Maybe for you Butch, but I am thinking this was a very useful and > informative thread and I hate to see someone stifled because of one mans > disdain.
Which part of the argument was "useful"? The specific parts of the conversation that I was referring to were not technical in nature. This thread does have some useful content for sure, but the specific conversation that I responded to did not. > We should all be able to discuss and hash things out without worrying we > are going to offend anyone. We are after all, professionals here. Discussion is fine. Hashing things out is fine. Arguing until the thread (or one specific part of the thread) degrades to the point where the argument becomes "my daddy can whip your daddy" as this one did is not fine. I don't see the professionalism in the 4 or 5 posts related to this conversation. I did not ask that the thread be closed anyway. I simply asked that people limit their comments to useful content and stop the petty bickering. -- ******************************************************************** * Butch Evans * Professional Network Consultation* * http://www.butchevans.com/ * Network Engineering * * http://www.wispa.org/ * WISPA Board Member * * http://blog.butchevans.com/ * Wired or Wireless Networks * ******************************************************************** -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
