Cost a *lot* more than a fiber and a fiber cable if you can do the  
tower future climbs yourself

Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
(321) 205-1100 x102

On Apr 29, 2009, at 1:31 PM, Kurt Fankhauser <k...@wavelinc.com> wrote:

>
> $2.90  per foot for the 5/8 heliax. Its 25% cheaper than LMR-900,  
> weighs
> less, and less loss.
>
>
> --
> Kurt Fankhauser
> WAVELINC
> P.O. Box 126
> Bucyrus, OH 44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>
>
> --------- Original Message --------
> From: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
> To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
> Date: 04/29/09 12:31
>
>>
>> YOu getting good prices on that?
>>
>> * -----------------------------------------------------------
>> Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
>> WISPA Board Member - wispa.org &lt;http://www.wispa.org/&gt;
>> Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik &amp; WISP Support Services
>> WISPA Vendor Member*
>> *Office*: 314-735-0270 *Website*: http://www.linktechs.net
>> &lt;http://www.linktechs.net/&gt;
>> */LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training/*
>> &lt;http://www.linktechs.net/onlinetraining.asp&gt;
>>
>> The information transmitted (including attachments) is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is  
> intended only
> for the person(s) or entity/entities to which
>> it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged  
>> material.
> Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking  
> of any
> action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities  
> other than
> the intended recipient(s) is prohibited, If you
>> received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the  
>> material
> from any computer.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
>> &gt; I don't hang radio's on towers for lightning reasons. I have
> installed
>> &gt; Andrews 5/8 Heliax and put all my radios at the bottom. This has
> worked out
>> &gt; very well for me and upgrades are a breeze because there is no
> climbing
>> &gt; involved :)
>> &gt;
>> &gt; Kurt Fankhauser
>> &gt; WAVELINC
>> &gt; P.O. Box 126
>> &gt; Bucyrus, OH 44820
>> &gt; 419-562-6405
>> &gt; www.wavelinc.com
>> &gt;
>> &gt;
>> &gt;
>> &gt; -----Original Message-----
>> &gt; From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org 
>> ]
> On
>> &gt; Behalf Of Scott Carullo
>> &gt; Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:48 AM
>> &gt; To: WISPA General List
>> &gt; Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference  
>> test
>> &gt;
>> &gt;
>> &gt; Another quick note...  if you have individual units why even  
>> mount
> them
>> &gt; like this inside a larger box?  Why not put individual RB411s in
> their own
>> &gt; small box (say DCE 7x6x2) and put the box outside right under  
>> the
> antenna?
>> &gt; Then you would have even more seperation and distribute you  
>> eggs a
> bit more
>> &gt; too...
>> &gt;
>> &gt; Scott Carullo
>> &gt; Brevard Wireless
>> &gt; 321-205-1100 x102
>> &gt;
>> &gt; -------- Original Message --------
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; From: &quot;Kurt Fankhauser&quot; &lt;k...@wavelinc.com&gt;
>> &gt;&gt; Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 10:36 AM
>> &gt;&gt; To: &quot;WISPA General List&quot;  
>> &lt;wireless@wispa.org&gt;
>> &gt;&gt; Subject: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference  
>> test
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt; About a week ago there was some discussion about 5ghz  
>> radio's
> being
>> &gt;&gt; installed in the same board and causing self-interference on
> adjacent
>> &gt;&gt; channels and possible even on the entire band thus  
>> decreasing
> throughput
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; on
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; backhauls. Because even if you were operating on  
>> frequency's 5745
> and
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; 5825
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; the two radio's would have side lobe harmonics that if  
>> installed
> in the
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; same
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; enclosure they would still &quot;hear&quot; each other at  
>> that
> short of separation.
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; I
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; decided to combat this problem and find a solution and  
>> share my
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; experience
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; with the list.
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt; I installed a single XR5 card into 3 different RB433's with
> indoor
>> &gt;&gt; enclosures. I also installed foil tape which I obtained  
>> from the
> local
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; True
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; Value store for $2.49 on all the vent holes and unused  
>> bulkhead
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; connector
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; holes. This was done in order to prevent RF side lobe  
>> leaks from
> the
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; three
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; radio's that would escape from the indoor enclosures  
>> themselves.
> Having
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; only
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; 1 card inside each enclosures I should not have a heat  
>> problem as
> the
>> &gt;&gt; outdoor box will not be in direct sunlight.
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt; I then stacked all 3 enclosures on top of each other with  
>> dummy
> loads on
>> &gt;&gt; each of the N-bulkhead connectors and did some testing.  
>> This is
> what I
>> &gt;&gt; found:
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt; I set the bottom board as AP and the middle board as  
>> Client on
> frequency
>> &gt;&gt; 5825. Even with this close of separation the two XR5's  
>> could only
> see
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; each
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; other at -83 on the same channel. With the top board  
>> connecting
> to the
>> &gt;&gt; bottom board they could only see each other at -90. Keep  
>> in mind
> this is
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; on
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; the same frequency so adjacent channels should be much  
>> less than
> that
>> &gt;&gt; possibly even in the -100 ranges. Wish I had a spectrum  
>> analyzer.
> With
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; two
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; boards separating the AP and Client there was no link at  
>> all. The
> two
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; boards
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; could not even see each other in an AP scan.
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt; Just as a comparison with the same radio's installed all  
>> on a
> RB600 not
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; on
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; top of each other but in the adjacent mpci slots the  
>> radio's were
> all
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; seeing
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; each other at -30's. So I gained roughly -55 db of  
>> separation by
> doing
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; it
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; this way. So all I would have to do now is make sure that  
>> the
> antennas
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; on
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; the tower have at least 10 foot of vertical separation and  
>> the
>> &gt;&gt; self-interference problem should be gone and I should be  
>> enjoying
> much
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt; more
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; throughput!
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt; Thoughts anyone?
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt; Kurt Fankhauser
>> &gt;&gt; WAVELINC
>> &gt;&gt; P.O. Box 126
>> &gt;&gt; Bucyrus, OH 44820
>> &gt;&gt; 419-562-6405
>> &gt;&gt; www.wavelinc.com
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;
> --- 
> --- 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> &gt; ----
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt; WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> &gt;&gt; http://signup.wispa.org/
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;
> --- 
> --- 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> &gt; ----
>> &gt;
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt; WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt; Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> &gt;&gt; http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;&gt; Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> &gt;&gt;
>> &gt;
>> &gt;
>> &gt;
>> &gt;
>> &gt;
> --- 
> --- 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> &gt; ----
>> &gt; WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> &gt; http://signup.wispa.org/
>> &gt;
> --- 
> --- 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> &gt; ----
>> &gt;
>> &gt; WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>> &gt;
>> &gt; Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> &gt; http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> &gt;
>> &gt; Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> &gt;
>> &gt;
>> &gt;
>> &gt;
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> &gt; WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> &gt; http://signup.wispa.org/
>> &gt;
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> &gt;
>> &gt; WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>> &gt;
>> &gt; Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> &gt; http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>> &gt;
>> &gt; Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>> &gt;
>>
>>
>>
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> --- 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to