There are a lot of counties in eastern Kentucky that have way too many
mountains & trees for me. They've begged for us to come out there but I'm
not up to that task!
-RickG

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Marlon K. Schafer 
<o...@odessaoffice.com>wrote:

> I think so.
>
> 24 million just seems to be such a large number when you take into account
> the well known underreporting of our industry segment (and perhaps
> others?).
>
> It's hard to imagine that all of our hard work thus far has left so many
> homes untouched.
>
> At a lowly 40% take rate and $20 per month per account that's $288,000,000
> in MONTHLY revenue left sitting idle.  It just makes no sense to me.  I
> can't get my arms around the idea that we've left that many homes with no
> options.
>
> I can see 24 million households with no service.  I just can't see that
> many
> with no access to service.  Heck, I have people that still have dialup
> internet even though they are within spitting distance of a tower.  Do they
> count as one of the 24 million?
>
> laters,
> marlon
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chuck Bartosch" <ch...@clarityconnect.com>
> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ
>
>
> > So, the salient points are, as I understand it (correct me if I'm wrong):
> >
> > (1) Brian's numbers are 24 million currently HAVE NO ACCESS TO SERVICE.
> > His number DOES NOT INCLUDE the number who have access but have chosen
> not
> > to subscribe.
> >
> > (2) You haven't seen the underlying data yourself because much of it is
> > private data that you didn't purchase yourself. You get to see the
> > analysis from it because Brian HAS purchased it and combined it with
> > publicly available data.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > On Jan 20, 2010, at 11:46 PM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
> >
> >> Heya Brian,
> >>
> >> That's the take I had on this.  That the number of households services
> >> was
> >> based on the 477 data.  I didn't see any other data sets that would give
> >> an
> >> indication of the number of actually services households.
> >>
> >> If the study is based only on the consumers reported via the 477 it's
> >> likely
> >> to be quite inaccurate.
> >>
> >> People in government etc. are often quite amazed at the number of
> >> customers
> >> that I service out here.  And I'm just one of a great many companies
> >> offering services in the area.
> >>
> >> I'm trying to get a handle on what additional sources of fact based
> >> information are out there.  It's important to know what the real number
> >> is
> >> and yours seems very high to me.  I don't think it'll be helpful in the
> >> long
> >> term if we have a number that gets blown out of the water in the
> upcoming
> >> census.
> >>
> >> marlon
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Brian Webster" <bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com>
> >> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:00 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ
> >>
> >>
> >>> Marlon,
> >>> Read this take rate brief I wrote with one of the data companies I work
> >>> with. It will take you about 10 minutes. It goes in to specific detail
> >>> of
> >>> how the study was conducted and the sources of the data. It was written
> >>> for
> >>> the 10 minute managers of the world. The key to being able to come up
> >>> with
> >>> the numbers was having the data at the census block level in the first
> >>> place. Prior to July of this year there were no sources that I am aware
> >>> of.
> >>> The only information drawn from the form 477 is the total number of
> >>> residential subscribers by state. The number of households without
> >>> access
> >>> to
> >>> broadband has no relationship to the 477 data. That should be spelled
> >>> out
> >>> in
> >>> the report.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thank You,
> >>> Brian Webster
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]on
> >>> Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:32 PM
> >>> To: WISPA General List
> >>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> OK, as I understand that the report is based upon the 477 data?
> >>> marlon
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: Jack Unger
> >>> To: WISPA General List
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:41 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Marlon,
> >>>
> >>> See the attached report. Go to Table 2 on page 11. Look at the last
> cell
> >>> in the lower, right-hand corner.
> >>>
> >>> jack
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
> >>> I still don't buy that number in the first place.  I wish I knew more
> >>> about
> >>> how Brian came up with it.
> >>>
> >>> What % of rural households does that work out to be?
> >>> marlon
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Jack Unger" <jun...@ask-wi.com>
> >>> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:27 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] From Today's WSJ
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Sorry but this article (accidentally or intentionally) misses or (more
> >>> likely) ignores the point that 24 or more million occupied American
> >>> households have no access to broadband. The WSJ is merely a mouthpiece
> >>> (especially now that Rupurt Murdoch owns it) for the telcos.
> >>>
> >>> jack
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Jeff Broadwick wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870365210457465250160837655
> >>> 2.ht
> >>> ml?mod=WSJ_Opinion_AboveLEFTTop
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>   * REVIEW & OUTLOOK
> >>>   * JANUARY 20, 2010
> >>>
> >>> A 'National Broadband Plan'
> >>> One more solution in search of a problem.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The Federal Communications Commission recently told Congress that it
> >>> will
> >>> miss a February deadline for delivering a "national broadband plan" and
> >>> requested a one-month extension. If it keeps missing deadlines, nearly
> >>> everyone in the U.S. might soon have high-speed Internet.
> >>>
> >>> As part of last year's stimulus package, Congress asked the FCC for a
> >>> plan
> >>> to ensure that everybody in the country has access to broadband. That's
> >>> a
> >>> worthy goal, but the idea of a government plan is based on a false
> >>> presumption that the spread of broadband is stalled. The reality is
> that
> >>> broadband adoption continues apace, as does the quality and speed of
> >>> Internet connections.
> >>>
> >>> Between 2000 and 2008, residential broadband subscribers grew to 80
> >>> million
> >>> from five million, according to a study by Bret Swanson of Entropy
> >>> Economics. Broadband penetration among active Internet users at home is
> >>> 94%,
> >>> and nearly 99% of U.S. workers connect to the Internet with broadband.
> A
> >>> typical cable modem today is 10 times faster than a decade ago.
> Wireless
> >>> bandwidth growth per capita has been no less impressive, showing a
> >>> 500-fold
> >>> increase since 2000.
> >>>
> >>> Meanwhile, U.S. information and communications technology investment in
> >>> 2008
> >>> alone totalled $455 billion, or 22% of all U.S. capital investment.
> >>> Nominal
> >>> capital investment in telecom between 2000 and 2008 was more than $3.5
> >>> trillion.
> >>>
> >>> Those who favor more government control of the Internet ignore this
> >>> private
> >>> progress and point to international rankings. According to OECD
> >>> estimates,
> >>> the U.S. ranks 15th in the world in broadband penetration per capita.
> >>> But
> >>> because household sizes differ from country to country, and the U.S.
> has
> >>> relatively large households, the per capita figures can be misleading.
> A
> >>> better way to gauge wired broadband connections is per household, not
> >>> per
> >>> person. By that measure the U.S. ranks somewhere between 8th and 10th.
> >>>
> >>> Such comparisons will soon be moot in any case because broadband
> >>> penetration
> >>> is growing rapidly in all OECD countries. The Technology Policy
> >>> Institute
> >>> notes that "at the current rates of broadband adoption the U.S. is
> >>> behind
> >>> the leaders only by a number of months, and all wealthy OECD countries
> >>> will
> >>> reach a saturation point within the next few years."
> >>>
> >>> Even the Obama Justice Department seems to reject the broadband market
> >>> failure thesis. "In any industry subject to significant technological
> >>> change, it is important that the evaluation of competition be
> >>> forward-looking rather than based on static definitions of products and
> >>> services," said the Antitrust Division in a January 4 filing to the
> FCC.
> >>> "In
> >>> the case of broadband services, it's clear that the market is shifting
> >>> generally in the direction of faster speeds and additional mobility."
> >>>
> >>> Justice concludes that while "enacting some form of regulation to
> >>> prevent
> >>> certain providers from exercising monopoly control may be tempting . .
> .
> >>> care must be taken to avoid stifling the infrastructure investments
> >>> needed
> >>> to expand broadband access."
> >>>
> >>> No matter, the default position of the Obama Administration is that
> >>> little
> >>> useful happens without government, so the FCC is busy planning.
> Chairman
> >>> Julius Genachowski is sympathetic to net neutrality regulations that
> >>> would
> >>> prevent Internet service providers from using differentiated pricing to
> >>> manage Web traffic. Liberal interest groups like Public Knowledge and
> >>> Harvard's Berkman Center for the Internet and Society are urging the
> >>> agency
> >>> to reinstitute "open access" mandates that would force cable operators
> >>> and
> >>> phone companies to share their infrastructure with rivals at
> >>> government-set
> >>> prices.
> >>>
> >>> The irony is that the private investment and innovation of recent years
> >>> have
> >>> occurred in the wake of the FCC rolling back similar rules that held
> >>> back
> >>> telecom in the 1990s. Consumers continue to have access to more and
> more
> >>> broadband services, while Google, YouTube, iTunes, Facebook and Netflix
> >>> originated in the U.S.
> >>>
> >>> Doesn't the Obama Administration have enough to do than mess with a
> part
> >>> of
> >>> the U.S. economy that is working well?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Jeff
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Jeff Broadwick
> >>> Sales Manager, ImageStream
> >>> 800-813-5123 x106     (US/Can)
> >>> +1 574-935-8484 x106  (Int'l)
> >>> +1 574-935-8488       (Fax)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> ----
> >>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> >>> http://signup.wispa.org/
> >>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> ----
> >>>
> >>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >>>
> >>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >>>
> >>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     --
> >>> Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
> >>> Network Design - Technical Writing - Technical Training
> >>> Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities
> Since
> >>> 1993
> >>> www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  jun...@ask-wi.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> ----
> >>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> >>> http://signup.wispa.org/
> >>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> ----
> >>>
> >>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >>>
> >>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >>>
> >>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> ----
> >>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> >>> http://signup.wispa.org/
> >>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> ----
> >>>
> >>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >>>
> >>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >>>
> >>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
> >>> Network Design - Technical Writing - Technical Training
> >>> Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities
> Since
> >>> 1993
> >>> www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  jun...@ask-wi.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> ------
> >>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> >>> http://signup.wispa.org/
> >>>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> ------
> >>>
> >>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >>>
> >>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >>>
> >>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> ----
> >>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> >>> http://signup.wispa.org/
> >>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> ----
> >>>
> >>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >>>
> >>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >>>
> >>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> >>> http://signup.wispa.org/
> >>>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >>>
> >>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >>>
> >>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> >> http://signup.wispa.org/
> >>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >>
> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >>
> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >
> > --------------
> > Chuck Bartosch
> > Clarity Connect, Inc.
> > 200 Pleasant Grove Road
> > Ithaca, NY 14850
> > (607) 257-8268
> >
> > "When the stars threw down their spears,
> > and water'd heaven with their tears,
> > Did He smile, His work to see?
> > Did He who made the Lamb make thee?"
> >
> >>From William Blake's Tiger!, Tiger!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to