I've been using MT APs and Ubnt CPEs.  Been very happy with them.

I do lose the speed test on the CPE, but it hasn't really been a big loss
compared to what I save (something like $215 to $70 per CPE).

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill


On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Tom DeReggi <wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net>wrote:

> yeah, but wouldn't it be nice to use UBQT CPE for 95% of the installs, and
> still be able to use a 3-9 eth port SBC when it is needed the remainig 5%,
> without having to deploy a new AP?  Of course, there is the option to use
> MT
> AP and UBQT CPE, but that wont happen in my network until the two share a
> common embedded speed testing tool, and verified common working polling or
> bridging (WDS) methods.
>
> I dont mind mismatching hardware brands, but prefer not to mismatch OSs,
> for
> the above reasons.  I'd gladly pay a $100 license to prevent the install of
> a second AP that generates a new reocurring cost to have colocated.
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards interfere?
>
>
> >From what I have heard memory requirements are much higher in RouterOS.
>
> I'd expect Mikrotik went out of their way to break it on Ubnt, too.
>
> Not to mention the fact that you'll need to buy a MT license for each
> device
> (even at $35/cpe that adds up).
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
> that counts.”
> --- Winston Churchill
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Tom DeReggi
> <wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net>wrote:
>
> > > I just wish I could load Router OS on my Ubiquity CPE's
> >
> > How do you know that you cant?
> >
> > UBQTs are MIPs processors and MT has MIPs compiled OSs.
> >
> > Has anyone tried?
> >
> > I'd argue the opposite... I love Mikrotik Hardware, the one entity that
> > understands the value of making Mutli-port ethernet at the CPE, with
> super
> > fast processors.
> > Wonder if Ubiquiti OS will load on 433AH? or RB800?
> >
> > Tom DeReggi
> > RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> > IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
> >
> >
> >  ----- Original Message -----
> >  From: Blair Davis
> >  To: WISPA General List
> >  Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 3:34 AM
> >  Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards
> > interfere?
> >
> >
> >  The following is IMHO... YMMV...
> >
> >  Only the R5H.
> >
> >  Bought a lot of 5 a while back.  Price looked good vs XR5.
> >
> >  Started testing them...
> >
> >  when hooked to the same ant, reported noise floor varied by 10db.
> >  tx power, as reported by the other end of the link varied by 7db.
> >  Units with strong tx had high error rates at higher modulations.
> >
> >  thought bad batch, swapped out 4 of them.  1 of the new ones was ok,
> > other
> > 3 as bad as ones I swapped.  Returned those 3 for credit.
> >
> >  used the 2 I had left in CPE's.  one went deaf after T-storm, (lost 20db
> > of sensitivity)  Other still in service.
> >
> >  My XR5's all match on reported noise floor within 2db.
> >  Tx power matches within 2db
> >  I've never had any  XR's bad out of the wrapper, and only 1 failed in
> the
> > field.  (direct lighting strike)
> >
> >  MikroTik makes great router software, and has learned to make good SBC's
> >  (routerboards)  IMHO, their radio cards are 'not good'.  (i'd have used
> > another word, but I don't want banned from the list!)
> >
> >  Ubiquity makes GREAT radios.  And good CPE's.  They can't make good
> > software for an AP or router if their lives depend on it...
> >
> >  I use routerboard with XR cards for my AP's and backhauls... I use
> > Nano's,
> > Loco's, and bullets for my CPE's now.
> >
> >  MikroTik and Ubiquity together.
> >
> >  I just wish I could load Router OS on my Ubiquity CPE's
> >
> >  Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> >    What ad luck did you have with the mikrotik cards, and also what model
> > card did you use? I only use the R5H from them.
> >
> >
> >
> >    Kurt Fankhauser
> >    WAVELINC
> >    P.O. Box 126
> >    Bucyrus, OH 44820
> >    419-562-6405
> >    www.wavelinc.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >    From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
> On
> > Behalf Of Blair Davis
> >    Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:27 PM
> >    To: WISPA General List
> >    Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ever wonder how bad RB333/444 stacked cards
> > interfere?
> >
> >
> >
> >    I'd love to see the same test with ubiquity XR cards....
> >
> >    I've had such bad luck with mikrotik's radio cards I don't use them
> any
> > more
> >
> >    Because of the channel overlap, I've always put only one xr-2 or xr-9
> > per metal enclosure.
> >
> >    However, I often put two xr-5 cards in the same enclosure, and
> separate
> > them by 2 channels or more, and do the same with CM9's on the 5.x bands.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>  
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >   WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> >  http://signup.wispa.org/
> >
> >
>  
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >
> >  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> >  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> >  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to