On 04/26/2010 08:12 PM, Tom DeReggi wrote: > Are you bridging at the AP and CPE, and does it work? > > Something something that was brought to my attention is that UBQT has Iperf > built in at teh command line. So technically, if we used UBQT at the CPE and > MT as AP, we could still do speed tests easilly, since all our MT APs plug > into our proprietary cell site routers which have Iperf. > > But does it bridge OK? We dont really need the MT AP. What we do need is 5-9 > port CPEs everyonce in a while, which locks us into the MT solutions in some > locations, or we ahve to add one more component of failure. Truthfully, that > is probably what we are going to start doing, where we decide to use UBQT. > Run UBQT radios, then put a MT router at the end where we need 5-9 ports. > They are pretty inexpensive now, its not that big a deal anymore to > duplicate expense. > Hey Tom...didya ever think of letting the customer supply there own "router" behind the RF CPE?
Leon -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
