Yes.

Regards,

Chuck



On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Eric Muehleisen <ericm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for posting your results Chuck. I've been looking into this idea for
> a while, but never pulled the trigger.
>
> I presume you used the Moto stock sectors?
>
> -Eric
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Chuck Hogg <ch...@shelbybb.com> wrote:
>>
>> I thought I would post back on here what we did and our results.
>> These are preliminary.
>>
>> Equipment:
>> 1 x 320AP
>>
>> Configuration with only one sector:
>> Power set to 19.9dB (per the manual for legal power settings)
>> AP set to -65 power leveling
>> Client signals at the AP were -65 (or thereabouts, this fluctuates
>> from -65 to -70) for all clients.
>> Client receive levels ranged from -61 to -75.
>>
>> Equipment:
>> 1 x 320AP
>> 4 x 16.5dB 90 degree sectors
>> 2 x 4 way splitters from L-Com
>>
>> Configuration with only one sector:
>> Power set to full 25dB (per the manual for legal power settings,
>> assuming a -6.5dB of loss)
>> AP set to -65 power leveling
>> Client signals at the AP were -65 (or thereabouts, this fluctuates
>> from -65 to -70) for all clients.
>> Client receive levels ranged from -64 to -78.
>>
>> So essentially by adding a 4 way splitter the clients receive levels
>> increased by about 3.5-4dB.  Tower receive levels were unchanged, as
>> most of the clients were power leveled down.  Only one client is
>> transmitting at full power now.  That client is also the highest
>> signal on both sides.  Most client transmit levels are also running at
>> a higher power now as well.
>>
>> Conclusion:
>> I think that running 1 x 320AP x 4 sectors through splitters is a
>> little aggressive.  If the majority of your clients are going to have
>> decent signal levels, then I see no problems with it.  However, I
>> think that our current situation is a little on the edge.  I think
>> that if you are looking for an inexpensive way to use 320AP's, I would
>> recommend this solution.  I think that this solution has a higher net
>> gain over using an 8dB omni.  My results show that it is pretty
>> consistent on being about a total loss of about 8dB using a 4 way
>> splitter.  You can overcome 6.1dB of that loss in turning up the
>> transmit power of the radios.   Your net loss is about 2.5-3dB,
>> however you are able to focus the sectors a little better.
>>
>> In the long run on future deployments, we will likely use 2 AP's and 4
>> sectors with 4x2way splitters (MIMO).  Once they reach capacity, we'll
>> add additional AP's.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to