Premades?  Or did you make your own and get as close as humanly possible?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373



On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Chuck Hogg <ch...@shelbybb.com> wrote:
> It is my understanding that they need to be of the same length.  That
> was our design, all the same length...we used 18" LMR 240 for this
> situation.
>
> Regards,
> Chuck
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Kristian Hoffmann <kh...@fire2wire.com> 
> wrote:
>> Do you have a reference for calculating the proper cable lengths and
>> antenna spacing based on frequency when using splitters in a
>> configuration like this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Kristian
>>
>> On 10/25/2011 06:39 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
>>> I thought I would post back on here what we did and our results.
>>> These are preliminary.
>>>
>>> Equipment:
>>> 1 x 320AP
>>>
>>> Configuration with only one sector:
>>> Power set to 19.9dB (per the manual for legal power settings)
>>> AP set to -65 power leveling
>>> Client signals at the AP were -65 (or thereabouts, this fluctuates
>>> from -65 to -70) for all clients.
>>> Client receive levels ranged from -61 to -75.
>>>
>>> Equipment:
>>> 1 x 320AP
>>> 4 x 16.5dB 90 degree sectors
>>> 2 x 4 way splitters from L-Com
>>>
>>> Configuration with only one sector:
>>> Power set to full 25dB (per the manual for legal power settings,
>>> assuming a -6.5dB of loss)
>>> AP set to -65 power leveling
>>> Client signals at the AP were -65 (or thereabouts, this fluctuates
>>> from -65 to -70) for all clients.
>>> Client receive levels ranged from -64 to -78.
>>>
>>> So essentially by adding a 4 way splitter the clients receive levels
>>> increased by about 3.5-4dB.  Tower receive levels were unchanged, as
>>> most of the clients were power leveled down.  Only one client is
>>> transmitting at full power now.  That client is also the highest
>>> signal on both sides.  Most client transmit levels are also running at
>>> a higher power now as well.
>>>
>>> Conclusion:
>>> I think that running 1 x 320AP x 4 sectors through splitters is a
>>> little aggressive.  If the majority of your clients are going to have
>>> decent signal levels, then I see no problems with it.  However, I
>>> think that our current situation is a little on the edge.  I think
>>> that if you are looking for an inexpensive way to use 320AP's, I would
>>> recommend this solution.  I think that this solution has a higher net
>>> gain over using an 8dB omni.  My results show that it is pretty
>>> consistent on being about a total loss of about 8dB using a 4 way
>>> splitter.  You can overcome 6.1dB of that loss in turning up the
>>> transmit power of the radios.   Your net loss is about 2.5-3dB,
>>> however you are able to focus the sectors a little better.
>>>
>>> In the long run on future deployments, we will likely use 2 AP's and 4
>>> sectors with 4x2way splitters (MIMO).  Once they reach capacity, we'll
>>> add additional AP's.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kristian Hoffmann
>> System Administrator
>> kh...@fire2wire.com
>> http://www.fire2wire.com
>>
>> Office - 209-543-1800 | Fax - 209-545-1469 | Toll Free - 800-905-FIRE
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to