No they were pre-made/tested by Titan Wireless.

Regards,

Chuck



On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
> Premades?  Or did you make your own and get as close as humanly possible?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Chuck Hogg <ch...@shelbybb.com> wrote:
>> It is my understanding that they need to be of the same length.  That
>> was our design, all the same length...we used 18" LMR 240 for this
>> situation.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chuck
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Kristian Hoffmann <kh...@fire2wire.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> Do you have a reference for calculating the proper cable lengths and
>>> antenna spacing based on frequency when using splitters in a
>>> configuration like this?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -Kristian
>>>
>>> On 10/25/2011 06:39 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
>>>> I thought I would post back on here what we did and our results.
>>>> These are preliminary.
>>>>
>>>> Equipment:
>>>> 1 x 320AP
>>>>
>>>> Configuration with only one sector:
>>>> Power set to 19.9dB (per the manual for legal power settings)
>>>> AP set to -65 power leveling
>>>> Client signals at the AP were -65 (or thereabouts, this fluctuates
>>>> from -65 to -70) for all clients.
>>>> Client receive levels ranged from -61 to -75.
>>>>
>>>> Equipment:
>>>> 1 x 320AP
>>>> 4 x 16.5dB 90 degree sectors
>>>> 2 x 4 way splitters from L-Com
>>>>
>>>> Configuration with only one sector:
>>>> Power set to full 25dB (per the manual for legal power settings,
>>>> assuming a -6.5dB of loss)
>>>> AP set to -65 power leveling
>>>> Client signals at the AP were -65 (or thereabouts, this fluctuates
>>>> from -65 to -70) for all clients.
>>>> Client receive levels ranged from -64 to -78.
>>>>
>>>> So essentially by adding a 4 way splitter the clients receive levels
>>>> increased by about 3.5-4dB.  Tower receive levels were unchanged, as
>>>> most of the clients were power leveled down.  Only one client is
>>>> transmitting at full power now.  That client is also the highest
>>>> signal on both sides.  Most client transmit levels are also running at
>>>> a higher power now as well.
>>>>
>>>> Conclusion:
>>>> I think that running 1 x 320AP x 4 sectors through splitters is a
>>>> little aggressive.  If the majority of your clients are going to have
>>>> decent signal levels, then I see no problems with it.  However, I
>>>> think that our current situation is a little on the edge.  I think
>>>> that if you are looking for an inexpensive way to use 320AP's, I would
>>>> recommend this solution.  I think that this solution has a higher net
>>>> gain over using an 8dB omni.  My results show that it is pretty
>>>> consistent on being about a total loss of about 8dB using a 4 way
>>>> splitter.  You can overcome 6.1dB of that loss in turning up the
>>>> transmit power of the radios.   Your net loss is about 2.5-3dB,
>>>> however you are able to focus the sectors a little better.
>>>>
>>>> In the long run on future deployments, we will likely use 2 AP's and 4
>>>> sectors with 4x2way splitters (MIMO).  Once they reach capacity, we'll
>>>> add additional AP's.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Chuck
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>>
>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kristian Hoffmann
>>> System Administrator
>>> kh...@fire2wire.com
>>> http://www.fire2wire.com
>>>
>>> Office - 209-543-1800 | Fax - 209-545-1469 | Toll Free - 800-905-FIRE
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to