I had a fun converstation the other day...

The consultant advisor's optinion was the Linux should be replaced with 
Cisco, on the merit that a soultion was needed that was well known, so 
investors would feel more comfortable knowing that operating the network 
didn't have to rely on me.  Then we discussed to operate the Cisco, we would 
need to hire a $150k per year Cisco engineer, at a cost 4x above the 
previous year's operating cost. So I responded questioning the consultant, 
"so you are saying we need build a network that relies on a high salary 
individual other than I? So then if the network breaks, I'd be helpless, and 
I'd be in deep trouble, if the Network engineer quit or asked for another 
raise? The advise didn't sit well with me, and it had nothing to do with a 
technology comparison of the two products types, and I in no way mean to 
downplay the value of Cisco.

My point here is... The most effective router is really the one that the 
user is most familiar with. It doesn't matter how powerful the Cisco, 
Juniper and foundry are, if you and your techs dont know how to operate 
them, when you need to on a moments notice. Its really about, which 
selection will allow you to more easilly and speedily resolve the task at 
hand.

Its amazing how a $400 Linux Box (such as MIkrotik) can quickly solve a 
problem.

With that said, We've been looking into Juniper lately, I like that their 
new lines are all based on the same Juno OS, which is Linux. :-)

So, my recommendation is... What are you familiar with? Use that.

I'm not familiar with the Juniper model and foundry products listed to know 
if that is a good product to keep or not.

What I will say is, if uysing MIktotik, you want to consider more than jsut 
number of subs. What speed is the Internet backbone the MT would connect to?
How would you plan to use the Mikrotik, from a protocol feature perspective? 
A MT1100 will easilly push 100mb FDX traffic. But if you plan on having a 
lot of queuing and rules (x200 users), it can be slowed down very quickly. 
In those cases, its worth paying an extra $200-$400, to upgrade to one of 
the faster CPUcore type third party hardware models, such as sold by Baltic, 
Titan, or LinkTechnologies. A Dual core INtel 1.5G-2.4Ghz CPU model are very 
affordble and adds some horsepower for using MT features.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe" <aajayi...@as-technologies.com>
To: <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Juniper Network


>I just took over an abandoned network which I have to get up and running in 
>no time. There's a Juniper J2300, ISG 1000 and some foundry switches. 
>Wondering whether to trash the equipment and put in an MT RB1100 in? We 
>won't have more than 200 users at the peak. Need suggestions.
>
> Thanks
>
> Akinlolu C. Ajayi-Obe
> AS Technologies Ltd
> Tel. 234(0)8023258027
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireless-requ...@wispa.org
> Sender: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:00:06
> To: <wireless@wispa.org>
> Reply-To: wireless@wispa.org
> Subject: Wireless Digest, Vol 49, Issue 22
>
> Send Wireless mailing list submissions to
> wireless@wispa.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> wireless-requ...@wispa.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> wireless-ow...@wispa.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Wireless digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re:  If radios act weird today... (~V~)
>   2. Re:  If radios act weird today... (Jim Patient)
>   3. Re:  If radios act weird today... (~V~)
>   4.  Engenius hardware from Microcenter (don't do it!) (Ben West)
>   5. Re:  Engenius hardware from Microcenter (don't do it!)
>      (Sam Tetherow)
>   6. Re:  Engenius hardware from Microcenter (don't do it!) (Ben West)
>   7. Re:  If radios act weird today... (Tom DeReggi)
>   8. Re:  Engenius hardware from Microcenter (don't do it!) (Ben West)
>   9. Re:  Engenius hardware from Microcenter (don't do it!)
>      (Jeromie Reeves)
>  10.  Solution for high bandwidth semi-mobile link (cj sattler)
>  11. Re:  Solution for high bandwidth semi-mobile link (Gino Villarini)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:21:17 -0600
> From: "~V~" <li...@stlbroadband.com>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] If radios act weird today...
> To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Message-ID: <001e01ccdac4$f74fa960$e5eefc20$@com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I am wearing it! ;-)
> And doesn't it have to be made of tin foil? :p
>
> ~V~
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Bret Clark
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 9:45 AM
> To: wireless@wispa.org
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] If radios act weird today...
>
> Oh man...where is my aluminum foil hat!!!
>
> On 01/24/2012 09:57 AM, ~V~ wrote:
>> Check out the incoming particles this bad boy is bringing.
>> http://youtu.be/01SEGNfK_58
>>
>> ~V~
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Mike Hammett
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 8:38 AM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] If radios act weird today...
>>
>> Same. It could eventually happen, but I haven't seen any consequence of
> it.
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/24/2012 8:08 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>> YAWN.  I have yet to see a solar flare cause issues .... not saying it
>>> won't... just saying the news media blows this stuff up every time.
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt Hoppes
>>> Director of Information Technology
>>> Indigo Wireless
>>> +1 (570) 723-7312
>>>
>>> On 1/24/12 8:53 AM, Bret Clark wrote:
>>>> Solar flare blasts radiation storm toward Earth
>>>>
>>>>
>>
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57364089-76/solar-flare-blasts-radiation-s
>> torm-toward-earth/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----
>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>>
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----
>>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>>
>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:46:50 -0600
> From: "Jim Patient" <jpati...@linktechs.net>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] If radios act weird today...
> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Message-ID:
> <50710e9a7e64454c974049fc998eb65503e...@03-exchange.lti.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Crap this is prolly going to cause the New Madrid fault to blow as well.
>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHL-9zK8i0Q
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Forbes Mercy
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 9:48 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] If radios act weird today...
>
> Maybe some of those solar particles could penetrate this continual day
> to day snow we're having and recharge my solar sites! :)
>
> Forbes
>
> On 1/24/2012 6:57 AM, ~V~ wrote:
>> Check out the incoming particles this bad boy is bringing.
>> http://youtu.be/01SEGNfK_58
>>
>> ~V~
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
>> On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 8:38 AM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] If radios act weird today...
>>
>> Same. It could eventually happen, but I haven't seen any consequence
> of it.
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/24/2012 8:08 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>> YAWN.  I have yet to see a solar flare cause issues .... not saying
>>> it won't... just saying the news media blows this stuff up every
> time.
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt Hoppes
>>> Director of Information Technology
>>> Indigo Wireless
>>> +1 (570) 723-7312
>>>
>>> On 1/24/12 8:53 AM, Bret Clark wrote:
>>>> Solar flare blasts radiation storm toward Earth
>>>>
>>>>
>> http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57364089-76/solar-flare-blasts-radia
>> tion-s
>> torm-toward-earth/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>> ----
>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>> ----
>>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>>
>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>> ----
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>> ----
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>> ----
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>> ----
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4763 - Release Date:
>> 01/24/12
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4763 - Release Date:
> 01/24/12
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:48:27 -0600
> From: "~V~" <li...@stlbroadband.com>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] If radios act weird today...
> To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Message-ID: <004501ccdad1$2478ac50$6d6a04f0$@com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> LOL, probably not.
> There was a much larger particle storm in 2005 and nothing happened.
>
> But it is radiation and works like a microwave on the core of the earth,
> which can cause lava to expand.
>
> Appx. 24 - 48 hrs. prior to the Haiti, New Zealand, Japan, and Chile EQ
> there were strong solar storms.
> So it does give one something to ponder.
>
> ~V~
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Jim Patient
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 12:47 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] If radios act weird today...
>
> Crap this is prolly going to cause the New Madrid fault to blow as well.
>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHL-9zK8i0Q
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Forbes Mercy
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 9:48 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] If radios act weird today...
>
> Maybe some of those solar particles could penetrate this continual day
> to day snow we're having and recharge my solar sites! :)
>
> Forbes
>
> On 1/24/2012 6:57 AM, ~V~ wrote:
>> Check out the incoming particles this bad boy is bringing.
>> http://youtu.be/01SEGNfK_58
>>
>> ~V~
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
>> On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 8:38 AM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] If radios act weird today...
>>
>> Same. It could eventually happen, but I haven't seen any consequence
> of it.
>>
>> -----
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/24/2012 8:08 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
>>> YAWN.  I have yet to see a solar flare cause issues .... not saying
>>> it won't... just saying the news media blows this stuff up every
> time.
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt Hoppes
>>> Director of Information Technology
>>> Indigo Wireless
>>> +1 (570) 723-7312
>>>
>>> On 1/24/12 8:53 AM, Bret Clark wrote:
>>>> Solar flare blasts radiation storm toward Earth
>>>>
>>>>
>> http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57364089-76/solar-flare-blasts-radia
>> tion-s
>> torm-toward-earth/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>> ----
>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>> ----
>>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>>
>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>> ----
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>> ----
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>> ----
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>> ----
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ----------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4763 - Release Date:
>> 01/24/12
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4763 - Release Date:
> 01/24/12
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:16:41 -0600
> From: Ben West <b...@gowasabi.net>
> Subject: [WISPA] Engenius hardware from Microcenter (don't do it!)
> To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
> Message-ID:
> <CADSh-SN4E1LmP-n6=k0dfmzqa2mezatbb2wdj-8m8xx5wj2...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Although I'm guessing very few folks on this list use Engenius EOC-1650
> access points, I can relate that my very small experiment sampling product
> quality in outdoor Engenius gear from Microcenter has yielded 100% duds.
>
> That is, of the APs purchased in a pinch last month because my usual
> supplier was out of stock, all of them, 100% of them, or not 0% of them,
> have been returned due to defects discovered.
>
> Both appeared to have transmitter failures, one exhibited maybe 20% or 30%
> of the tx power it should have had, and the other appears to have lost its
> transmitter entirely.
>
> Thankfully, Microcenter took them both back, probably to be packed back
> into boxes and re-shelved.
>
> -- 
> Ben West
> http://gowasabi.net
> b...@gowasabi.net
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/attachments/20120124/1f02982f/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:44:30 -0600
> From: Sam Tetherow <tethe...@shwisp.net>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Engenius hardware from Microcenter (don't do it!)
> To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
> Message-ID: <4f1f7a9e.3000...@shwisp.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Haven't bought anything from Engenius since the CB3s, we tried some of
> their new 802.11g gear when it first came out and found that it had
> hardware issues (high failure rate and overheating issues, even
> indoors).  It failed even faster than HighGain stuff did.
>
> Now the CB3, that was an indistructable radio, I have over a hundred
> still deployed after 7 years although they are all due to get replaced
> this spring since we didn't get everything replaced last fall.
>
> On 01/24/2012 09:16 PM, Ben West wrote:
>> Although I'm guessing very few folks on this list use Engenius
>> EOC-1650 access points, I can relate that my very small experiment
>> sampling product quality in outdoor Engenius gear from Microcenter has
>> yielded 100% duds.
>>
>> That is, of the APs purchased in a pinch last month because my usual
>> supplier was out of stock, all of them, 100% of them, or not 0% of
>> them, have been returned due to defects discovered.
>>
>> Both appeared to have transmitter failures, one exhibited maybe 20% or
>> 30% of the tx power it should have had, and the other appears to have
>> lost its transmitter entirely.
>>
>> Thankfully, Microcenter took them both back, probably to be packed
>> back into boxes and re-shelved.
>>
>> -- 
>> Ben West
>> http://gowasabi.net
>> b...@gowasabi.net <mailto:b...@gowasabi.net>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/attachments/20120124/3a99aebc/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:55:15 -0600
> From: Ben West <b...@gowasabi.net>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Engenius hardware from Microcenter (don't do it!)
> To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
> Message-ID:
> <CADSh-SOyPz49VxwiD=7ryocyjunrrcprskohurlxqnhxjxl...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I have actually have pretty decent experience specifically with the
> EOC-1650s, so far with about 20 deployed and a couple approaching 2years
> outdoor operation.  Interestingly, the 1650's have proven more reliable
> than more Engenius' powerful units like EOC-2610 or EOC-2611P, suggesting
> overheats.
>
> I do understand Engenius had (has) substantial quality control problems, 
> if
> not just outright product quality deficits, a few years ago.  It's no
> surprise Engenius markets its products as cheaper clones of UBNT gear.
>
> Still, the 1650's seem to be a very popular unit with my preferred
> supplier, as they are sold out from time to time.  (Which was what lead me
> to Microcenter ...)
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Sam Tetherow <tethe...@shwisp.net> wrote:
>
>> **
>> Haven't bought anything from Engenius since the CB3s, we tried some of
>> their new 802.11g gear when it first came out and found that it had
>> hardware issues (high failure rate and overheating issues, even indoors).
>> It failed even faster than HighGain stuff did.
>>
>> Now the CB3, that was an indistructable radio, I have over a hundred 
>> still
>> deployed after 7 years although they are all due to get replaced this
>> spring since we didn't get everything replaced last fall.
>>
>>
>> On 01/24/2012 09:16 PM, Ben West wrote:
>>
>> Although I'm guessing very few folks on this list use Engenius EOC-1650
>> access points, I can relate that my very small experiment sampling 
>> product
>> quality in outdoor Engenius gear from Microcenter has yielded 100% duds.
>>
>>  That is, of the APs purchased in a pinch last month because my usual
>> supplier was out of stock, all of them, 100% of them, or not 0% of them,
>> have been returned due to defects discovered.
>>
>>  Both appeared to have transmitter failures, one exhibited maybe 20% or
>> 30% of the tx power it should have had, and the other appears to have 
>> lost
>> its transmitter entirely.
>>
>>  Thankfully, Microcenter took them both back, probably to be packed back
>> into boxes and re-shelved.
>>
>>  --
>> Ben West
>> http://gowasabi.net
>> b...@gowasabi.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Ben West
> http://gowasabi.net
> b...@gowasabi.net
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/attachments/20120124/e1d8623a/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:06:51 -0500
> From: "Tom DeReggi" <wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] If radios act weird today...
> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Message-ID: <e887d380e5654b6ea38ad0194c059...@rapiddsl.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> Actually, I've observed RF issues from Solar Flares numerous times in the
> past. A common symptom is RSSI dropping up to 10 db temporarilly during 
> the
> effected period on some paths.
> Can be a problem for links operating on the threshold of acceptable link. 
> It
> helps to know when the solar flairs come, just so you know to wait it out,
> instead of sending a truck to chase every temporary RSSI drop that day.
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com>
> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 9:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] If radios act weird today...
>
>
>> YAWN.  I have yet to see a solar flare cause issues .... not saying it
>> won't... just saying the news media blows this stuff up every time.
>>
>>
>> Matt Hoppes
>> Director of Information Technology
>> Indigo Wireless
>> +1 (570) 723-7312
>>
>> On 1/24/12 8:53 AM, Bret Clark wrote:
>>> Solar flare blasts radiation storm toward Earth
>>>
>>> http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57364089-76/solar-flare-blasts-radiation-storm-toward-earth/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:52:22 -0600
> From: Ben West <b...@gowasabi.net>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Engenius hardware from Microcenter (don't do it!)
> To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
> Message-ID:
> <CADSh-SM_g54=JpfZQXUbmSzcq=fxd3kcox3j0rzwbgr6xkv...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Unrelated, I would be curious if anyone has had acceptable experience with
> Engenius' Nanostation M clone, the ENH200 and ENH500.
>
> Googling the OpenWRT and DD-WRT forums doesn't suggest anyone has been
> playing around with them.
>
> -- 
> Ben West
> http://gowasabi.net
> b...@gowasabi.net
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/attachments/20120124/e205fea4/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:55:22 -0800
> From: Jeromie Reeves <jree...@18-30chat.net>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Engenius hardware from Microcenter (don't do it!)
> To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
> Message-ID:
> <cadykxswdfcvjtfwjjj-nyxnpf4ggu9eea7ayhsouboawsuy...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> I had looked at them but they cost more so did not see a reason to try
> them as Ubnt works for me. I have heard of some serious issues with
> Ubnt gear from August/October time. I bought gear to last with all the
> shortages. Its time to order more and might
> give the Engenius gear a closer look.
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Ben West <b...@gowasabi.net> wrote:
>> Unrelated, I would be curious if anyone has had acceptable experience 
>> with
>> Engenius' Nanostation M clone, the ENH200 and ENH500.
>>
>> Googling the OpenWRT and DD-WRT forums doesn't suggest anyone has been
>> playing around with them.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ben West
>> http://gowasabi.net
>> b...@gowasabi.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:01:53 -0800
> From: cj sattler <cjsatt...@hotmail.com>
> Subject: [WISPA] Solution for high bandwidth semi-mobile link
> To: <wireless@wispa.org>
> Message-ID: <bay170-w139af205c4658787b1fc12faf...@phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> I need to figure out a solution for high bandwidth (160mb/link
> unidirectional) link.  There will be a total of 6 links originating from
> a central point where the remote station will be mobile up to 30
> degrees from the originating point up to 6 miles away.  Because of the 
> bandwidth required, i doubt i
> could do anything on 5ghz because of the spectrum available.  I dont
> think there is any licensed frequencies out there that allow for 30
> degree sectors.
>
>
> One solution i was thinking would be licensed point to point to a
> pole that is 1000 feet away from the mobile station.  From there i've
> seen free space optics be able to have tracking on them.  I'm not sure
> if itll do 30 degrees though.
>
>
> Does anyone have any ideas or equipment that might work?
>
> thanks
> cj
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/attachments/20120125/7de6325a/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:06:01 +0000
> From: Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Solution for high bandwidth semi-mobile link
> To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
> Message-ID:
> <d26588db857e2948835d6c7a27c9879e43d2a...@aeromail1.aeronetpr.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Ptp link to the nearest point as you stated, them a PTP600 link using a 60 
> deg dual pol sector on the Master
>
> Gino A. Villarini
> g...@aeronetpr.com<mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com>
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
> 787.273.4143
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On 
> Behalf Of cj sattler
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 1:02 PM
> To: wireless@wispa.org
> Subject: [WISPA] Solution for high bandwidth semi-mobile link
>
> I need to figure out a solution for high bandwidth (160mb/link 
> unidirectional) link.  There will be a total of 6 links originating from a 
> central point where the remote station will be mobile up to 30 degrees 
> from the originating point up to 6 miles away.  Because of the bandwidth 
> required, i doubt i could do anything on 5ghz because of the spectrum 
> available.  I dont think there is any licensed frequencies out there that 
> allow for 30 degree sectors.
>
> One solution i was thinking would be licensed point to point to a pole 
> that is 1000 feet away from the mobile station.  From there i've seen free 
> space optics be able to have tracking on them.  I'm not sure if itll do 30 
> degrees though.
>
> Does anyone have any ideas or equipment that might work?
>
> thanks
> cj
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/attachments/20120125/ea887e4f/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> End of Wireless Digest, Vol 49, Issue 22
> ****************************************
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to