I agree. We used to have a bunch of 3.65 Ubnt deployed in PTMP. I have removed almost all of it after being unable to maintain stable performance.
If you are going to use it, keep connections pure line of sight and keep all AMQ and Capacity above 90%. Also don't install anyone over -66dbm signal. Do not put more than one AP on any site nor within 6 miles of another AP where the APs can see each other or any clients can possibly see more than one AP. Also make sure you have no other competitors in the area use 3.65 as any noise really seems to kill this equipment. I use 3.65 (25mhz channel) on PTP links with at least 2' dishes a lot, but nothing else. On 07/31/2013 08:26 AM, Gino Villarini wrote: > Don't do it... > > Gino A. Villarini > g...@aeronetpr.com > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > 787.273.4143 > > -----Original Message----- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of daniel.mul...@metrocom.ca > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 11:01 AM > To: wireless@wispa.org > Subject: [WISPA] Recommendations for Ubiquiti 3.65 site > > We are putting up a 3.65 GHz system next week to take existing customers off > of an existing Canopy 2.4GHz system. > > Is there anyone who has deployed the 3 Ghz gear from Ubnt and could recommend > which model of CPE and if there anything to know to avoid a steep 'learning > curve' since we have never deployed anything from Ubiquiti until now. > > Suggestions as to the best prices are most welcome too! > > Thanks, > > Daniel > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
