Like I said, for a price. https://www.vitesse.com/products/software/sdk

We need mainline kernel support, as well as the user space layer1 and layer2 
diagnostic tools.

On December 30, 2014 2:49:35 PM AKST, Fred Goldstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 12/30/2014 6:41 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>> I agree with about 50% of this.
>>
>> All of the products I know of that run trill or spb or support
>several 
>> MEF levels are Linux based that are driving FPGAs.
>>
>> You also have stuff like this:
>http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/sklvarjo/y1731/
>>
>> If you look at cumulus networks, their Linux based stack is driving 
>> data center network virtualization forward by giving you a common 
>> software platform on abstracted hardware. None of it is MEF, but 
>> saying Linux has stagnated on the general network front isn't 
>> accurate. It does lack a decent open source carrier stack though, 
>> including the MEF pieces and things like MPLS. Thankfully some
>vendors 
>> have stepped into that space... For a price.
>>
>
>I'm not saying that Linux can't play a role.  But the ones you're 
>describing (like Cumulus) are proprietary hardware products using 
>embedded Linux to perform some, not all, of the functions. RouterOS, 
>EdgeOS, fooWRT, and similar OSs are however just Linux, using built-in 
>Linux routing capabilities.  And even that is in an entirely different 
>direction from MEF; data center stuff is still connectionless MAC or IP
>
>switching.  So it's not that Linux isn't present in all sorts of
>places; 
>it's just that Linux isn't bringing CE to the party.
>
>The actual forwarding protocols for Carrier Ethernet don't seem to have
>
>been implemented for Linux.  At least not in the open kernel. So
>they're 
>not available to the dirt-cheap Linux router market that WISPs like.
>
>I do hope we can get some RINA stuff into circulation though; fully 
>baked (and this hasn't all been coded yet), it is a functional superset
>
>of both CE, MPLS, IP, and IPsec, among other things, with a much
>smaller 
>footprint.
>
>> On December 30, 2014 2:19:40 PM AKST, Fred Goldstein 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>     On 12/30/2014 5:05 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>>>     How many WISPs have heard of MEF or CE or even VPLS?
>>>
>>>     So...  have you asked for it yet?   :-p
>>>
>>>
>>>     [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>     I may have once asked somebody from MT about it, maybe at a show,
>>     and they gave the predicted answer, that they're a *router*
>>     company.  Sort of like DEC, which was a inicomputer company.
>>
>>     Of course MEF has a lot of specs now.  They aren't all critical,
>>     but support for the basic connection types, with QoS, is what
>>     matters. But this is foreign to the whole Linux-router market. 
>>     Linux is a fossil of the early 1990s, when eye pee was still sort
>>     of the new thing, and everything else was assumed to be the
>enemy,
>>     or the eeevull telephone company.  RouterOS is basically a lot of
>>     lipstick on top of Linux.  That world still assumes that
>>     connectionless is next to godliness, that QoS is impossible, and
>>     that Ethernet is orange hose tied together with MAC-table
>bridges.
>>
>>     For those unfamiliar with it, Carrier Ethernet, which is
>>     standardized by the Metro Ethernet Forum, uses the Ethernet frame
>>     format to provide a wide range of services that aren't bridging. 
>>     There's point to point Ethernet Private Line, there's PtMP
>>     Ethernet Virtual Private Line, and there's MPtMP LAN emulation. 
>>     It's usually connection-oriented, using the VLAN tag as the
>>     connection ID, not the MAC.  It offers CIR+EIR support ("three
>>     color").  It is protocol-agnostic to higher layers.  It is
>>     manageable.  And with the new SPB, it has OSPF routing between
>>     network elements, not just RSTP.
>>
>>     In other words, it's Ethernet Formatted Frame Relay.  And that's
>>     good; it's an improvement over the original slow telco FR.  It's
>>     the fastest-growing area in telecom (it's the new standard for
>>     cellular backhaul, for instance). But it's not ideologically part
>>     of the Linux/IP family, and people from that world (which
>includes
>>     most WISP suppliers) neither understand it nor understand why
>it's
>>     needed.
>>
>>     -- 
>>       Fred R. Goldstein      k1io    fred "at" interisle.net
>>       Interisle Consulting Group
>>       +1 617 795 2701
>>
>>    
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>     Wireless mailing list
>>     [email protected]
>>     http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. 
>
>
>-- 
>  Fred R. Goldstein      k1io    fred "at" interisle.net
>  Interisle Consulting Group
>  +1 617 795 2701

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to