Cell companies are subsidized you are not.
Foot print smaller.
Small tower can not support size of cell phone equipment
Ground food print small
Electrical usage pennies verse $1k per month. Many cell rents at $2.5 k pay electric. Most cell leases lately for footprint tower is under $200.
Walk away if expectation is not realistic
We have 138 locations less then $5k annual rent. 140 free internet subs. Pennies.
Believe in your value.
On Jan 11, 2017 7:54 PM, lakeland <lakel...@gbcx.net> wrote:
Go by square footage. Your footprint is much smaller than a cell provider...Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphoneOn 1/11/17 15:56, Tim wrote:-------- Original message --------From: Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us>Date: 1/11/17 7:32 PM (GMT-05:00)To: wireless@wispa.orgSubject: Re: [WISPA] Going Rate for Smaller Structures
> Free internet
> Warranty on all equipment
>
> Would not do a per sub. The trust factor is to high risk.
>
>
How do you guys handle people that have been poisoned by what cell
companies pay? Like if someone says they need at least $2,500/mo from
you because that's what they would get from Verizon/AT&T/Sprint. I
usually want to say if a cell company wanted to be at your site they
probably would have by now, but I say something like they have a bigger
subscriber base than we do and we're only looking to target X customers
in this area vs. thousands of mobile devices.
~Seth
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
