On Sun 9.Nov'08 at 23:43:48 +0100, Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> On Sun 9.Nov'08 at 14:00:42 -0800, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> > Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
> > > On Sun 9.Nov'08 at 12:28:53 -0800, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> > > > Carlos R. Mafra wrote:
[....]
> If the end result is to make more sense to everybody, "user" should be
> used as the author.
It is not just me who thinks like this, btw.
Today there was an email in the git list from someone trying
to import patches from Mercurial into Git, and one of the
lines from his code is
author = re.search("# User (.+)", p).groups()[0]
That is what makes sense to me.
The complete email is here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/100636
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
