http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/relative/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a website I've recently developed (www.cabotconsultants.com.au) I opted for this...
p.body { font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small; color: #036; margin-left: 18px; margin-right: 18px; line-height: 2; }
I found it's clean and clear. Just wondering... What is the difference of using the percentage font-size as opposed to the preset "medium, small, x-small, etc" sizes? Are these 'preset' sizes still relative to the body user defined font size?
Cheers Darian
On Tuesday 23 March 2004 15:55, Lorenzo Gabba | Quirk wrote:
I tend to agree - I'm a fan of the
p, .etc { font-size: 0.75em; line-height 1.5; }
I forgot to mention that it's probably a good idea (from a usability POV) to declare:
body {font-size: 100%;} /* user defined default size */
... and relate the rest from there.
- Lorenzo
--
...._/\/ŻŻŻŻŻŻ\/\_..... (w) www.quirk.co.za (e) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (h) +27 (0)86 11 021 33 (t) +27 (0)21 462 7353 (f) +27 (0)21 462 7354 ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************
*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
*****************************************************
-- Neerav Bhatt http://www.bhatt.id.au ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************