I still think the Satay method is more elegant (and has far less code clutter)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Jessey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 6:07 AM Subject: Re: [WSG] <EMBED> tag > Mario, > > Ian Hickson recently came up with a more elegant alternative to the Satay > and JavaScript solutions. > Read his post about it here: http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1081798064&count=1 > And see his example here: > http://damowmow.com/playground/demos/flash/001.html > > > Simon Jessey > ---------------------------------- > mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > web : http://jessey.net/blog/ > work: http://keystonewebsites.com/ > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [WSG] <EMBED> tag > > > > I've noticed that the <EMBED> tag doesn't comply with XHTML, but won't > > display Flash clips in NN, Mozilla, or Firefox if omitted. This poses a > > real problem because I use small Flash clips in customer sites as banner > > ads, and if I remove the <EMBED> tag then the Flash file won't load, and > > there's a hole in my page. > > > > Any suggestions that will help me resolve this problem would be greatly > > appreciated. > > ***************************************************** > The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > for some hints on posting to the list & getting help > ***************************************************** > > > ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************
