I have not made a study of the accessibility guidelines in depth, but my
guess would be that they are referring to elements that can be resized like
text rather than positional elements and that confusion arises because of
vagueness like that.  Just a thought, probably wrong, but hey.  :)

------------------
Iain Gardiner
http://www.firelightning.com


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andy Budd
Sent: 30 July 2004 10:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] Fixed vs flexible layouts


Hi folks,

Everybody has an opinion on fixed vs flexible layouts. Some people 
prefer how fixed width sites look, and there is little doubt that they 
are easier to build. Others hate the whitespace around fixed width 
designs, thinking they look ridiculous on large monitors.

For a site to get a AA accessibility rating, you are supposed to use 
relative units (%, em) rather than fixed units (px). However the WAI 
guidelines do say that, if you use fixed units, you must make sure that 
your site is usable.

Personal preferences aside, what "accessibility" problems to people see 
with fixed width layouts and what are the scale of these problems. 
Could the same arguments hold true for "elastic layouts" (layouts based 
on ems) and do "flexible layouts" (those based on %) have their own 
accessibility issues?

Is it acceptable for the vast majority of fixed width CSS based sites 
to claim AA compliance if all other priority 1 and 2 checkpoints are 
met?

Andy Budd

http://www.message.uk.com/

*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
***************************************************** 



*****************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
***************************************************** 

Reply via email to