I was talking about an ordered list over an unordered list. I never said
anything about using tables.
On Wed, 23 May 2007 17:00:31 +1000, Patrick H. Lauke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John Faulds wrote:
As I said, I couldn't say for certain what the relationship might be,
but my guess with the example given, as it's a photo gallery site,
would be that the photographer/artist feels like the photos should be
in a certain sequence, perhaps to facilitate the telling of a story
through images. That's only a theory without any back-up info from the
original poster, but I think illustrates that there could be occasions
when adding an order to images might be important.
Again, I'd say that source order is enough of "an order", without the
need to drag out a table to hold the whole layout of the thumbnail
gallery together.
P
--
Tyssen Design
www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph: (07) 3300 3303
Mb: 0405 678 590
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
