Which site?
James Jeffery wrote:
Big company, worldwide infact. A great one for the resume but I failed it.
I was brought in at the end of the project to fix some bugs. Let me
just say that from viewing the source it was majorly flawed! I spent 6
hours on it before handing in the towel right near their deadline. The
CSS was unstructured, way to much repetition which was the cause of
some bugs and errors.
The only way out of that was to rewrite the whole lot. I mean the guys
who were on this project were creating empty spans with classes to
push elements along a page (like spacers). They had an empty <h1> with
a <span> inside it for the logo they placed in using CSS ... that was
only a part of the issue.
I don't question my knowledge. It's up to par and I have completed a
number of jobs, but on this occasion I sucked ... or they sucked ...
or both. This website will be released to the world, and millions will
use it, but its awfully constructed, not semantic at all and its
another case of a poor website on the web.
Ah well. Lesson learn't. Never jump into a project at the last minute
to be relied upon for a couple of pennies.
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
*******************************************************************
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org
*******************************************************************