Jason, I would not feel comfortable working for a client with such disregard for accessibility. To extend your argument if the client asks me to break the law does that make it OK? There is a real business need to have even intranet systems that are accessible.
As for your assertion in the following line: > If nothing else I think I have sparked up a healthy debate about > accessibility whether I am right or wrong. I think there is a difference between "sparking healthy debate" and being a troll. -- Peter Mount Web Development for Business Mobile: 0411 276602 i...@petermount.com http://www.petermount.com On 31/01/2010, at 3:57 AM, Jason Grant wrote: > > @Peter Mount To some extent we are playing with fire developing > however we are developing. Sometimes (within Intranet systems > specially) we are specifically told by the client to develop for > IE6/IE7 and not care about other browsers as the client is trying to > save cash on testing (dev and UAT) and so on. Bottom line, there are > circumstances within which 'playing with fire' is what the client > wants. > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
