On 20 Oct 2010, at 16:59, cat soul wrote: > will there be/can there be a new command/property which can be read by each > device the way it needs to be? > > could there be soon a "touch" command so that you could write the code like: > > "hover, do this. If no hover, then touch, do this. If no touch, then ______ > and do this"
We shouldn't need it. We have :hover which can be thought of "When the user is potentially about to activate something" and we have :active which is "When the user is activating something". That should be enough until you start trying to use :hover for doing things beyond indicating the possibility of activation, and one you start doing that … http://www.cennydd.co.uk/2010/end-hover-abuse-now/ -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
