Hi Bill, > On Jul 1, 2015, at 8:39 AM, Bill Somerville <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 01/07/2015 14:25, Steven Franke wrote: >> Bill, Joe, Michael, and all, > Hi Steve, >> Do we know what change caused the larger stack requirement? >> Yes, I caused this problem by being lazy when I added the arrays used for >> signal subtraction. I’m at work this morning, but will be able to look at >> this and move these large arrays to the heap this afternoon. If you’d rather >> not wait, then feel free to fix it. > No problem, I have amended the build script to allow for this so you can > deal with the root problem at your leisure.
I have moved the large arrays off of the stack. When you get a chance, can you confirm that the program will now compile on Windows without the need to increase the stack size? Steve k9an > > 73 > Bill > G4WJS. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud. > GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that > you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business. > Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today. > https://www.gigenetcloud.com/ > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud. GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business. Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today. https://www.gigenetcloud.com/ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
