> I am able to run simulated QSOs between two instances of WSJT-X with > MSK144, the performance seems very good with very short pings decoding > cleanly and reliably. The SNR numbers are suspiciously high but that may > be because of the effectively noise free channel I am using, what is the > SNR reporting range of MSK144? First impressions show that this is much > better than JTMSK.
Hi Bill - Glad to hear that it’s working for you. I have a new detector that works even better on the real data that Joe and I collected earlier in the week. I think that this next version will also do a better job on the SNR estimates — but it will probably still be inaccurate for the very high SNRs that you get with a loopback test, just like the current JTMSK SNR estimates… Hope to upload the changes yet tonight once I clean things up a bit. Steve k9an ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
