are you talking about the 7047 frequency?
Is so, then possibly the issue is because of the W1AW CW Practice
frequency is....
7.0475
Could be a problem?
Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 4/30/2019 6:43 AM, Gary Kohtala - K7EK via wsjt-devel wrote:
It's already happening. Just a few minutes ago on the current 40m FT4
frequency I am hearing multiple
attempts at jamming and harassment. People tuning up and swishing
their VFO's, sending unidentified
CW messages such as "Go away", etc. They have to be very optimistic
thinking that (m)any of the folks on
JT modes are able to hear them and/or be expected to respond to CW
messages. Absolutely hilarious.
The jammers don't know that the software will just see their attempts
at disruption as very insignificant
bumps in the road. FT4 will just keep on sending until the message is
received, just like the other JT
modes. Very entertaining. I seem to remember something similar when
FT8 exploded onto the scene in a similar manner. Let's revisit this in
six months and see where we stand.
Best regards,
Gary, K7EK
---
On Tuesday, April 30, 2019, 7:32:44 AM EDT, James Shaver
<kd2...@gmail.com> wrote:
60 is never included because people don’t read before they transmit (I
know that’s a shocker) and were transmitting out of band or illegally
because of the vast differences between 60 meter rules.
> On Apr 30, 2019, at 7:25 AM, Christoph Berg <c...@df7cb.de
<mailto:c...@df7cb.de>> wrote:
>
> Re: Bill Somerville 2019-04-29
<6c16f722-5577-e692-e1a3-78a3c38b9...@classdesign.com
<mailto:6c16f722-5577-e692-e1a3-78a3c38b9...@classdesign.com>>
>> In summary WSJT-X v2.1.0 RC5 will have the following FT4 suggested
>> frequencies (the Iter1 column):
>>
>> Band Iter0 Iter1 Notes
>> -----------------------------------------
>> 80 3595 3575 (plus 3568 Region 3)
>> 40 7090 7047
>
> Shouldn't 60m be included here as well? (Also FT8)
>
> (My assumption is that FT4 will take much of the existing FT8 traffic,
> because people hate waiting. Judging by the amount of FT4 on the first
> day, that might happen very soon.)
>
> Christoph
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
