*my. Not “it” Auto correct on iOS hates me.
> On Apr 30, 2019, at 10:47 AM, James Shaver <[email protected]> wrote: > > I watched one CW signal on 40 intentionally move until it was zero beat with > MY signal. Not a single QSO was disrupted by them. Hilariously, their > attempt to QRM gave me great data about how easily the protocol will reject > DQRM of that nature. The irony is delicious. > > Jim S. > N2ADV > >> On Apr 30, 2019, at 7:43 AM, Gary Kohtala - K7EK via wsjt-devel >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It's already happening. Just a few minutes ago on the current 40m FT4 >> frequency I am hearing multiple >> attempts at jamming and harassment. People tuning up and swishing their >> VFO's, sending unidentified >> CW messages such as "Go away", etc. They have to be very optimistic thinking >> that (m)any of the folks on >> JT modes are able to hear them and/or be expected to respond to CW messages. >> Absolutely hilarious. >> The jammers don't know that the software will just see their attempts at >> disruption as very insignificant >> bumps in the road. FT4 will just keep on sending until the message is >> received, just like the other JT >> modes. Very entertaining. I seem to remember something similar when FT8 >> exploded onto the scene in a similar manner. Let's revisit this in six >> months and see where we stand. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Gary, K7EK >> >> --- >> >> >> On Tuesday, April 30, 2019, 7:32:44 AM EDT, James Shaver <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> 60 is never included because people don’t read before they transmit (I know >> that’s a shocker) and were transmitting out of band or illegally because of >> the vast differences between 60 meter rules. >> >> > On Apr 30, 2019, at 7:25 AM, Christoph Berg <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Re: Bill Somerville 2019-04-29 >> > <[email protected]> >> >> In summary WSJT-X v2.1.0 RC5 will have the following FT4 suggested >> >> frequencies (the Iter1 column): >> >> >> >> Band Iter0 Iter1 Notes >> >> ----------------------------------------- >> >> 80 3595 3575 (plus 3568 Region 3) >> >> 40 7090 7047 >> > >> > Shouldn't 60m be included here as well? (Also FT8) >> > >> > (My assumption is that FT4 will take much of the existing FT8 traffic, >> > because people hate waiting. Judging by the amount of FT4 on the first >> > day, that might happen very soon.) >> > >> > Christoph >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > wsjt-devel mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> wsjt-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >> _______________________________________________ >> wsjt-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
