I watched one CW signal on 40 intentionally move until it was zero beat with it signal. Not a single QSO was disrupted by them. Hilariously, their attempt to QRM gave me great data about how easily the protocol will reject DQRM of that nature. The irony is delicious.
Jim S. N2ADV > On Apr 30, 2019, at 7:43 AM, Gary Kohtala - K7EK via wsjt-devel > <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's already happening. Just a few minutes ago on the current 40m FT4 > frequency I am hearing multiple > attempts at jamming and harassment. People tuning up and swishing their > VFO's, sending unidentified > CW messages such as "Go away", etc. They have to be very optimistic thinking > that (m)any of the folks on > JT modes are able to hear them and/or be expected to respond to CW messages. > Absolutely hilarious. > The jammers don't know that the software will just see their attempts at > disruption as very insignificant > bumps in the road. FT4 will just keep on sending until the message is > received, just like the other JT > modes. Very entertaining. I seem to remember something similar when FT8 > exploded onto the scene in a similar manner. Let's revisit this in six months > and see where we stand. > > Best regards, > > Gary, K7EK > > --- > > > On Tuesday, April 30, 2019, 7:32:44 AM EDT, James Shaver <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > 60 is never included because people don’t read before they transmit (I know > that’s a shocker) and were transmitting out of band or illegally because of > the vast differences between 60 meter rules. > > > On Apr 30, 2019, at 7:25 AM, Christoph Berg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Re: Bill Somerville 2019-04-29 > > <[email protected]> > >> In summary WSJT-X v2.1.0 RC5 will have the following FT4 suggested > >> frequencies (the Iter1 column): > >> > >> Band Iter0 Iter1 Notes > >> ----------------------------------------- > >> 80 3595 3575 (plus 3568 Region 3) > >> 40 7090 7047 > > > > Shouldn't 60m be included here as well? (Also FT8) > > > > (My assumption is that FT4 will take much of the existing FT8 traffic, > > because people hate waiting. Judging by the amount of FT4 on the first > > day, that might happen very soon.) > > > > Christoph > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > wsjt-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
