Bill,

That is understandable. I normally build WSJT-X that way.

I wanted to try building the docs and was looking for a way with a smaller
footprint. According to Greg, KI7MT, there isn't.

Thanks again!

73,

--
Dave Slotter, W3DJS <https://www.qrz.com/db/W3DJS>


On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 5:22 PM Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com>
wrote:

> On 15/07/2019 22:01, Dave Slotter, W3DJS wrote:
> > While you're making changes, there are a lot of year references to
> > 2018 which should probably say 2019.  :-)
> >
> > And lastly, where do I get "a2x" for building the man pages? Is it in
> > ASCIIDoc? Installing that requires 800MB on my machine. Is there a
> > smaller installation method to get "a2x"? Not that I can't spare that
> > room, but that's a lot for one single binary...
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> a patch or pull request would be welcome if you have come across issues
> that need fixing.
>
> The easiest way to get around the a2x issue is to set the WSJT-X CMake
> options to skip the manpage and documentation builds. Configure CMake
> with these extra options:
>
> -D WSJT_SKIP_MANPAGES=ON -D WSJT_GENERATE_DOCS=OFF
>
> That will save you a lot of time, trouble, and disk space. Note this
> exactly how it is suggested to build from the source tarball of WSJT-X
> in this file:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/wsjt/wsjtx-superbuild/ci/master/tree/INSTALL
>
> that is packaged in that source tarball.
>
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to