Bill, That is understandable. I normally build WSJT-X that way.
I wanted to try building the docs and was looking for a way with a smaller footprint. According to Greg, KI7MT, there isn't. Thanks again! 73, -- Dave Slotter, W3DJS <https://www.qrz.com/db/W3DJS> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 5:22 PM Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com> wrote: > On 15/07/2019 22:01, Dave Slotter, W3DJS wrote: > > While you're making changes, there are a lot of year references to > > 2018 which should probably say 2019. :-) > > > > And lastly, where do I get "a2x" for building the man pages? Is it in > > ASCIIDoc? Installing that requires 800MB on my machine. Is there a > > smaller installation method to get "a2x"? Not that I can't spare that > > room, but that's a lot for one single binary... > > Hi Dave, > > a patch or pull request would be welcome if you have come across issues > that need fixing. > > The easiest way to get around the a2x issue is to set the WSJT-X CMake > options to skip the manpage and documentation builds. Configure CMake > with these extra options: > > -D WSJT_SKIP_MANPAGES=ON -D WSJT_GENERATE_DOCS=OFF > > That will save you a lot of time, trouble, and disk space. Note this > exactly how it is suggested to build from the source tarball of WSJT-X > in this file: > > https://sourceforge.net/p/wsjt/wsjtx-superbuild/ci/master/tree/INSTALL > > that is packaged in that source tarball. > > 73 > Bill > G4WJS. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel