Hi Al,
try 239.255.0.0.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 26/07/2020 21:34, alaw...@mudhawk.com wrote:
Thanks, Bill - this may be what I needed.
Both wsjtx and cqrlog have a place to specify an address. I'm
currently using 127.0.0.1. I can go see if there is a multicast
specification that I can put in here.
--al
WB1BQE
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] ERE: Feature Request
From: Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com
<mailto:g4...@classdesign.com>>
Date: Sun, July 26, 2020 3:45 pm
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Hi Mike,
applications that interoperate with WSJT-X using the UDP protocol
are supposed to support listening on a UDP multicast group
address, this allows multiple applications to listen on the same
port and each have all messages delivered to them. Unfortunately
several applications have not included multicast support, either
because they use tools that don't easily support it, or they
didn't see the need.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 26/07/2020 20:34, alaw...@mudhawk.com wrote:
HI Mike (and everybody else),
I was fascinated by your idea of using the UDP status messages,
but wanted to put together a POC and get past the initial
teething pains before making more noise. Today the lawnmower
broke, providing me such an opportunity... :)
As of now, I have a simple Python script (Borrowed heavily from
an internet tutorial on UDP. It connects to wsjtx 2.2.2, and
outputs blocks of data as exppected. From the ascii portions,
I recognize this as part of the block described in the
communication protocol, so in theory, I should be able to parse
this apart and get what I need.
I did, however, hit a snag. I also use CQRLOG for automatic
logging. Apparently CQRLOG also uses this integration, because I
get an address in use error if Imy script tries to connect while
CQRLOG is running. (it works fine otherwise, as outlined above.)
Fine points of networking aren't really my thing, but I like to
learn stuff. That said, before I go down a potentially bad
path, at the block diagram "architectural" level, is it
possible for 2 clients to share a UDP port, or is the desire to
also have CQRLOG running a deal breaker?
(I tried the secondary port (2233), but that appears to be
only logged data, not the treasure trove that is on port 2237.)
Thanks for any guidance!
--al
WB1BQE
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Feature Request
From: Mike Lewis <k7...@hotmail.com <mailto:k7...@hotmail.com>>
Date: Mon, July 20, 2020 4:09 pm
To: WSJT software development
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>>
I use a Python program to monitor the WSJT-X UDP status
message broadcasts. It has radio dial frequency and more. I
use the frequency to load the correct calibration data for my
remote VHF+ wattmeter. It in turn can be used to drive other
things.
The wattmeter is a Arduino or PSoC5 device attached to a rf
log detector and standard dual directional coupler.
It would seem the UDP status message has all you would need?
Mike
K7MDL
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/ghei36>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* alaw...@mudhawk.com <mailto:alaw...@mudhawk.com>
<alaw...@mudhawk.com <mailto:alaw...@mudhawk.com>>
*Sent:* Monday, July 20, 2020 12:46:50 PM
*To:* WSJT software development
<wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
<mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>>
*Subject:* Re: [wsjt-devel] Feature Request
Thank you Bill (And Bill) - that worked great and does
exactly what I was looking for! (In fact, I can feed it to
Python's simple webserver and watch for DX from anywhere... :)
I'm also going to try WB6DJI (Mike's) suggestion of JTDX.
I would really love it if the user_hardware request saw the
light of day at some point. I currently have 2 Raspberry PI
/ SDR combos which band hop on wspr all day, but if I
could get some extra data passed in around the wsjt-x
operating mode, and the frequency, I could do a lot in terms
of integrating the FT-8 setup into the rest of my shack so it
can drive my network aware antenna switches etc.
73, and thanks!
--al
WB1BQE
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel