* Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01.10.04 07:01]: > > F> Even more to the point, what would you download if you used w3m for > F> online browsing? > > That is all very nice but WWWOFFLE isn't looking at the HTTP headers > the browser sends out.
<Lost|misunderstood> the plot! I thought the objective was to fetch and cache non-advertising images (with the initial "fetch" of the entries in "monitored" and "outgoing") and not renew the cached images during subsequent online visits to the webpage. My question was genuine. I wanted to find out whether console browsers achieve their greater speeds by rejecting image files. Felix Karpfen -- Felix Karpfen Public Key 72FDF9DF (DH/DSA)
