F> I wanted to find out whether console browsers achieve their greater F> speeds by rejecting image files.
I'm sure they do, but not when using them thru wwwoffle, as with wwwoffle, it doesn't matter if you use lynx or even wget, you are still going to get included images too. You must to things like $ wwwoffle -d0 URL to not get included images. Indeed, what if one's computer has one sighted user, and one blind user. Could a single wwwoffled and wwwoffle.conf file accommodate both without getting useless images for the blind user, and without him needing to leave his browser to use wwwoffle -d0 etc.? "My browser plays by the rules (standards) but still I end up getting images" he says. Hmmm, perhaps wwwoffle should pay attention to browser generated request headers as an additional filter of what else not to get. Perhaps wwwoffle would then be '100% standards compliant"?
