Wallace Winfrey <wwinf...@gmail.com> writes: > Bottom-line: wxGlade felt clunky and rough around the edges, while > wxFormBuilder felt polished and more consistent. However, it's ultimately > an aesthetic choice. While it's true that it's easier to get Perl code from > wxGlade than the roundabout method I've described using Padre, I feel the > gains I get from designing my interfaces in wxFormBuilder over designing > them in wxGlade more than compensate for this.
Thanks for the clarification. Did you try Adam Kennedy's FBP::Perl ? -- Johan
