Herald, did you ever do the ping as I suggested while trying to watch
video to see if perhaps there are some bandwidth / latency issues?

     Another thing you might do is run a top on the server and watch the
load while you're playing video, from a command line do a free and make sure
you're not swapping.

-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
 Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting.
   Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers.
 See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.

On Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Harald Heigl wrote:

Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 20:11:29 +0200
From: Harald Heigl <harald.heigl1000+x...@gmail.com>
To: Robert Dinse <nan...@eskimo.com>
Cc: Harald Heigl <harald.heigl1000+x...@gmail.com>, x2go-user@lists.x2go.org
Subject: Re: [X2Go-User] Questions regarding mate/video quailty

Hi,

My server is still a core2duo, perhaps this is the problem? Anyone
here with similar "low" hardwaresettings?
I don't know what preemtive settings mean either I have to admit, I
got that information from fedora side. And I tried a real preemtive
kernel for fedora, but I don't see any differences (perhaps a very
small improvement, but this might be my subjective view).
As stated in my last mail ping are beyond 0.5ms, nearly every ping
before, during and after playing video with a handful spikes not
excedding 2-3ms.

Could it be my cpu, my graphic card on server side or my whole system?
I don't think the client (cause I used another client) or the network
(pings, network transfers ok) is the problem. But cpu is not over 20%
too. I haven't configured anything in x2goserver, just standard.
On my server nomachine is installed for testing if this matters
(nomachine is faster than x2go, but not really fast). Are there any
logs I can search. I even turned off selinux und firewall for testing
but it had no impact, firewall shouldn't be the problem either, cause
we go over ssh.

No idea right now...

Thanks,
Harald



2015-09-07 23:30 GMT+02:00 Robert Dinse <nan...@eskimo.com>:

     I get real time video, server I7-2600 100mb/s backbone, client, old
MacPro-1 4CPU 4G of RAM running Ubuntu 15.04 with preemptive kernel on
15mb/s Comcast cable modem, server running Fedora 22 with a pre-emptive
kernel, don't understand what "preemptive settings" mean, either kernel is
built so that it can be preempted or not.  I can get 30 frame/second video
not 1/2 frames per
second.  And even with a non-preemptive kernel I only see occasional
glitches
not 1 frame every ten second, so you've got something still really broken.
Did you try the ping I suggested?

-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
 Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting.
   Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers.
 See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.

On Mon, 7 Sep 2015, Harald Heigl wrote:

Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 23:24:42 +0200

From: Harald Heigl <harald.heigl1000+x...@gmail.com>
To: x2go-user@lists.x2go.org
Subject: Re: [X2Go-User] Questions regarding mate/video quailty

Hi,

I've got some more information: the kernel itself is not preemptiv,
but there are some preemptiv settings set. But I used an alternative
preemptive fedora kernel and found only small changes. What I found:
- In vlc I have to deactivate overlay-mode
- In Parole I have to set "No Xv" instead of "X11/XShm/Xv" in
settings, videooutput.

Parole works better than vlc and is at around 1-2 updates per second,
which is far better than every 10 second, but still not really
watchable.
Perhaps there is still some wrong setting on my computer (caching the
video-pictures?) or my server is at it's limit ...
Though there are still 3Gb (of 6Gb) free, CPU is working at 10-30%,
ping is nearly all the time lower than 0.5ms.

Thanks so far,
Are there any settings or players you prefer? Is a core2duo@2.13Ghz
too slow as server, which impact is on the graphic card (though I have
no problems locally)

Harald

2015-09-07 16:59 GMT+02:00 Robert Dinse <nan...@eskimo.com>:


     Do a uname -a on the box and see if it has PREEMPT in the result
string.
If it does then it is and then I'd start looking at resource usage on the
box
or possibly network latency issues.  Might do a ping from your client
while
watching a video and see if you get any network latency spikes.


-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
 Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and
Hosting.
   Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers.
 See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800)
246-6874.

On Mon, 7 Sep 2015, Harald Heigl wrote:

Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 13:39:01 +0000

From: Harald Heigl <harald.heigl1000+x...@gmail.com>
To: x2go-user@lists.x2go.org
Subject: Re: [X2Go-User] Questions regarding mate/video quailty

Hi,

I don't think, that the client is the problem, cause I tested also a
second
x86-fedora22-client with exactly the same result, so I expect the server
is
the problem. I've asked at fedoraforum cause of preemptive kernel and
they
say the standard is still preemptive.

With nomachine 4.0 video is much better (even if not 100%), but with
nomachine I can't use virtual desktop for free.

Any other suggestion? Server requirements, ... ?

Thanks,
Harald

Robert Dinse <nan...@eskimo.com> schrieb am So., 6. Sep. 2015 22:06:


      I'm not familiar with your client machine but on the server side,
build
a kernel with kernel pre-emption enabled, for myself at least it helped
considerably.




-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
  Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and
Hosting.
    Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script
readers.
  See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800)
246-6874.

On Sun, 6 Sep 2015, Harald Heigl wrote:

Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 22:01:48 +0200
From: Harald Heigl <harald.heigl1000+x...@gmail.com>
To: x2go-user@lists.x2go.org
Subject: Re: [X2Go-User] Questions regarding mate/video quailty

Hi,

I have still the problem, that running video over x2go (per vlc or
mates default paroleplayer) is really slow and laggy.
server: Fedora 22, core2duo, x86, 4.0.1.19
client: linaro, cubieboard, armhf, 4.0.5.0

- I have testet with another x86 computer as client with no change
- I have connected the server with the other x86 client directly to
find out if the network has a problem, with no change
- I have tried iperf, but the speed of my gigabit lan is fast
- I have changed the graphiccard of my server (if that changes
anything)

I have to admit, that my server is an old core2duo/computer, with old
radeoncard, ssd and 6GB RAM, but I just want to connect a single user
from another room inside my home. (and at max one physical user)
Fedora 22 was set up on the server 2 months ago with a fresh install
and a lot of packages like libreoffice, 2 browsers, ... . x2goserver
was set up from the repos.
Running videos directly on the computer is no problem.
Are there any limitations or something  I can check (logs, something I
can try out) or are there any minimum system requirements?

Thanks,
Harald


2015-08-24 22:30 GMT+02:00 Harald Heigl
<harald.heigl1000+x...@gmail.com
:


Hi,

Thanks for pointing this out. I had x2goserver 4.0.1.19 on fedora and
4.0.1.xx on my client, which seemed to be an old version. I assumed
server and client-version belong together. I installed 4.0.5.0 (from
ubuntu armhf repos) on the client but had the same difficulties,
eventhough it was better and more fluent now.
I'll see if I can find another x86 computer and try it from there. I
think my client is the problem (or the armhf-packages not 100% the
right one for cubieboard).
I will need some days to identify the guilty part, I'll write her
again.

Thanks for all the information,
Harald

2015-08-24 19:16 GMT+02:00 Orion Poplawski <or...@cora.nwra.com>:


On 08/24/2015 06:37 AM, Harald Heigl wrote:


Hi,

Thanks for the information I just used the
fedora(server)/linaro(client) included repos and they have both
some
4.0.1 ...
Fedora won't be a problem (I can see a x2go-repo in the wiki), I
hope
I find some armel-builds for my cubieboard. any hints? (sometimes
rasbperry-builds work as well)

I'll test it at home a little bit later and tell you.



You seem to be mixing client and server versions here a bit.  Fedora


has


x2goserver 4.0.1.19 (latest) and x2goclient 4.0.5.0 (latest).  The


version


numbers are not linked.


--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                       or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301                   http://www.nwra.com


_______________________________________________
x2go-user mailing list
x2go-user@lists.x2go.org
http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user




_______________________________________________
x2go-user mailing list
x2go-user@lists.x2go.org
http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user



_______________________________________________
x2go-user mailing list
x2go-user@lists.x2go.org
http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user

Reply via email to