Hi, Because projects like x2go, nomachine, ... are saying that it works (video, nomachine even says for their products you can do CAD even if I doubt this) and you don't see real differences from sitting in front of your pc. I don't want to use it mainly for video, I can use my PS3 for this. But if I want to watch a short video, so why not and if I optimize settings (what I've done) for video (which needs bandwith and good speed), also the rest of using will be more fluent, so my thoughts. Don't misunderstand me, 1920x1080p is the native solution of my screen as most screens nowadays have, I don't think that other people here who said they are getting 30fps real time video are using 640x480 for connecting via x2go. And since transfer is compressed I know I won't get the same quality as fullhd through hdmi (which has far more bandwidth than gigabit lan) and my videos themself are far away from fullhd, at least most of them. So not the video is 1080p, but the screen resolution! But at least between two x86 pcs I now get a fullscreen video with kaffeine (+audio) which is quite fluent and quality is quite ok.
Cubieboard itself is sometimes a little bit slow and there is no "real" chrome (just chromium), and some other things. So I thought I'd just use it as a thin client for my main-pc (which is used by 2 persons incuding me) and I wanted to see if I can get it there where I don't notice any differences between sitting in front of my pc or siiting "remote" in the next room. My last test with two x86 pcs went quite well, I'll have to test a little more with my board. So problem here solve, video is playing. But I've still the problem with my right mouse click, any ideas? Thanks, Harald 2015-09-13 10:52 GMT+02:00 Eliezer Croitoru <elie...@ngtech.co.il>: > On 13/09/2015 11:27, Harald Heigl wrote: >> >> So x2go-server seems to work at least it works so well, that I don't >> notice any real differences. >> So I tested with cubietruck (cubieboard 3.0, armhf, mali-GPU) as >> client once again: >> - nomachine, ssh and kaffeine have also given some significant >> speedup. At least a video covering one third of the screen (at >> 1920x1080p) is running really well, fullscreen is still a little but >> jumping, not as bad as before, but clearly visible. > > Are you series? > 1080p? You should really watch it in another way then X. > The basic 1080P video size requires more then a specific amount of > bandwidth. > Why would you want to watch a 1080P video over X? > > Eliezer > > > _______________________________________________ > x2go-user mailing list > x2go-user@lists.x2go.org > http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user _______________________________________________ x2go-user mailing list x2go-user@lists.x2go.org http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user
