On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 08:06:46PM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing: > On Sat, 14 Jun 2008, Tom Russo wrote: > > > STL is pretty much solid now. 8 years ago when we started Xyce we had a > > lot of trouble with it, but relied on it heavily anyway. Now it's hard > > to find a compiler that does it wrong, but when you find one you usually > > have to pay a lot for it. > > > > STL rocks. > > Is is available for the small systems as well? With C++ will we > have problems with executable size on the small systems? Talking > handheld Linux devices and the like.
STL is so basic to C++ at this point that it is practically part of the language. It's like worrying that you won't have "printf" in a C implementation. But since I don't ever use small handheld devices and don't know what development environments they have, I can't answer for sure. -- Tom Russo KM5VY SAR502 DM64ux http://www.swcp.com/~russo/ Tijeras, NM QRPL#1592 K2#398 SOC#236 AHTB#1 http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?DDTNM "It's so simple to be wise: just think of something stupid to say and then don't say it." --- Sam Levinson _______________________________________________ Xastir-dev mailing list Xastir-dev@xastir.org http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir-dev
