v1.9.0 (APX190). So we're off on even/odd numbers. You're going for a
stable release, right? Stables, in my book, are not even numbers.
gerry
Curt, WE7U wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Jeremy Utley wrote:
As a non-developer I would agree with this as well. Major changes
usually involve changes in the ABI/API that makes things incompatible
with the previous release, or large changes in the code base that
almost makes it an entirely new application. For just the minor
changes that have been in CVS since the last stable release, it would
seem a bump in the minor version would be the most we should do here.
In other words go to 1.10 instead of 2.0, and make the next devel
version be 1.11?
This might muck with the TOCALL a bit. Right now we're sending
APX185. We'd need to send APX110 which would appear to be going
backwards in our revisions.
--
Curt, WE7U. APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer
"Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown
"Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U
"The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
_______________________________________________
Xastir mailing list
Xastir@xastir.org
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
--
Gerry Creager -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University
Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983
Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
_______________________________________________
Xastir mailing list
Xastir@xastir.org
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
