Comments anyone ?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 07:16:42 +0700
From: Edwin Pratomo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Fwd: RFC: XML::Xalan (was: Re: perl/xalan)]
Hi Dirk,
I'm working on a Perl binding to Xalan C++, and it will be made
available under GPL/Artistic license.
Is it fine for me to use the XML::Xalan namespace?
And do I have to include the Apache Software License quotation in the
source code,
like one in XML::Xerces?
rgds,
Edwin.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RFC: XML::Xalan (was: Re: perl/xalan)
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 00:59:19 +0700
From: Edwin Pratomo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <5035BDBA4802D411850300508B6DD14A72A2EA@WIBLHS>
> "Williamson, James" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm new to this list so please excuse my ignorance.
> Has anyone wrapped xalan (C++) for perl using XS/Swig?
Ok, I've just started working on it. Currently it's on
http://edwin.or.id/~edwin/XML-Xalan-0.03.tar.gz
It covers interface to XalanTransformer class, which seems to be pretty
stable, but with a bit limited usability.
Therefore I'm working on another class (not finished yet) which aims to
provide easy-to-use interface while still retaining useful and desirable
features such as compiled stylesheet, runtime parameter setting, DOM
input/output.
Also I'd like to make sure that it's okay to use XML::Xalan as the
namespace.
The Apache software license seems to be very restrictive on such issue,
as it states:
4. The names "Xalan" and "Apache Software Foundation" must
* not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this
* software without prior written permission. For written
* permission, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rgds,
Edwin.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
