In my opinion, use of Xalan is ok by me, in this context.
-scott
Edwin Pratomo
<ed.pratomo@com To: "Jason E. Stewart"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
puter.org> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], (bcc: Scott
Sent by: Boag/CAM/Lotus)
ed.pratomo@comp Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFC: XML::Xalan
(was: Re: perl/xalan)] (fwd)
uter.org
04/11/2001
05:02 AM
Please respond
to pmc
"Jason E. Stewart" wrote:
>
> Hey Ed,
>
> I'm really glad to see someone making Perl bindings to Xalan, Thanks!
>
> I would definately use the XML::Xalan namespace, there was already
> some discussion about what namespace to use for XML::Xerces (in the
> xerces-p-dev list if you want to look at the archives), and XML::Xalan
> would mirror that nicely.
Thanks. So I'll keep on using it. I'm just making sure that I'm not
violating the apache software license's naming rule.
This module consists of two primary packages, XML::Xalan::Transformer
which is a straightforward interface to XalanTransformer class, and
XML::Xalan which is a higher layer that works by coordinating other
packages at lower level. Once I've got this stable, I'll upload it to
CPAN.
rgds,
Edwin.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [Fwd: RFC: XML::Xalan (was: Re: perl/xalan)] (fwd) Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: [Fwd: RFC: XML::Xalan (was: Re: perl/xalan)... Jason E. Stewart
- Re: [Fwd: RFC: XML::Xalan (was: Re: perl/xa... Edwin Pratomo
- Re: [Fwd: RFC: XML::Xalan (was: Re: perl/xalan)... David_N_Bertoni
- Re: [Fwd: RFC: XML::Xalan (was: Re: perl/xa... Jason E. Stewart
- Scott_Boag
