Hey Ed,
I'm really glad to see someone making Perl bindings to Xalan, Thanks!
I would definately use the XML::Xalan namespace, there was already
some discussion about what namespace to use for XML::Xerces (in the
xerces-p-dev list if you want to look at the archives), and XML::Xalan
would mirror that nicely.
As far as the License goes, I stuck it in it's own file in the
distribution, and mentioned it from the README. However a lot of the
code had it already. I wouldn't mind seeing it go away from the source
code files, but that isn't really up to me. Anyone else feel strongly,
or is it enought to include the license once with the distribution?
jas.
"Dirk-Willem van Gulik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Comments anyone ?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 07:16:42 +0700
> From: Edwin Pratomo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Fwd: RFC: XML::Xalan (was: Re: perl/xalan)]
>
> Hi Dirk,
>
> I'm working on a Perl binding to Xalan C++, and it will be made
> available under GPL/Artistic license.
> Is it fine for me to use the XML::Xalan namespace?
> And do I have to include the Apache Software License quotation in the
> source code,
> like one in XML::Xerces?
>
> rgds,
> Edwin.
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RFC: XML::Xalan (was: Re: perl/xalan)
> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 00:59:19 +0700
> From: Edwin Pratomo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> References: <5035BDBA4802D411850300508B6DD14A72A2EA@WIBLHS>
>
> > "Williamson, James" wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm new to this list so please excuse my ignorance.
> > Has anyone wrapped xalan (C++) for perl using XS/Swig?
>
> Ok, I've just started working on it. Currently it's on
> http://edwin.or.id/~edwin/XML-Xalan-0.03.tar.gz
> It covers interface to XalanTransformer class, which seems to be pretty
> stable, but with a bit limited usability.
> Therefore I'm working on another class (not finished yet) which aims to
> provide easy-to-use interface while still retaining useful and desirable
> features such as compiled stylesheet, runtime parameter setting, DOM
> input/output.
>
> Also I'd like to make sure that it's okay to use XML::Xalan as the
> namespace.
> The Apache software license seems to be very restrictive on such issue,
> as it states:
> 4. The names "Xalan" and "Apache Software Foundation" must
> * not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this
> * software without prior written permission. For written
> * permission, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> rgds,
> Edwin.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
