I vote 1 I think it is prefereable that the xerces refers to xercesc/util/... instead of util/... /Christoffer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Changing include to include/xercesc - Summary an... Tinny Ng
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... Erik Rydgren
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... Jason E. Stewart
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... Olivier Schmitt
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... John-Mark Newton
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... Adams, David
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc... Jason E. Stewart
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... Christoffer Dam Bruun
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... Jesse Pelton
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc... Jason E. Stewart
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... Murray Cumming
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... Tinny Ng
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc... Murray Cumming
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... Peter A. Volchek
- RE: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... Hespelt, Steve (Exchange)
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... Tinny Ng
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc... Murray Cumming
- Re: Changing include to include/xercesc - S... J. J. Merelo
