Hi Jason,
I'm happy to help set a blackout date, but I think we need to get the migration spec together first, and get basic agreement on that, before setting such a date.
I don't sense that there's a big demand for access to the current trunk, but I know I, for one, am eager to get past the svn migration and start work on the 3.0 trunk. ('Course there's no particular reason to wait for svn before branching, but to do so holds for me a certain sense of propriety ;)
I'm guessing that we could do the migration within 3-5 days of your release of the migration spec, assuming that there's not major back and forth on the details...
-jdb
On Feb 19, 2005, at 6:11 AM, Jason E. Stewart wrote:
James Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:We also have complete consent on the move from cvs to svn, so we should move forward aggressively on this. How's your work, Jason? ;)Give me a blackout deadline. No more CVS commits after that. Then I'll grab the CVS snapshot. Shall we say Wed Feb 23, midnight PST? People don't have to worry about having local changes that aren't checked in. If people do have local changes they don't want to commit, they can check out the code from SVN, and then copy their locally modified files on top of the SVN checked-out files. Cheers, jas. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
