Hi Brian: I believe you'll be doing the best for xHarbour. So please go ahead, I'll just follow. -- Andi
On Fri, 23 May 2008 10:00:43 -0700 "bhays" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andi and all: > > I have spent many hours over the past week trying to deal > with all the new features done to rddads in Harbour. > Since what I've been talking about is a whole replacement > of the source files, any posts you do now would have to > be re-synced with the new files. > Are you prepared to re-do that after I replace all the files? > Note that a few of the other changes you did are already > handled in the new sources. > > If you are proposing that we instead diverge from the Harbour > RDDs, then that is a huge problem. > > Our build process need not follow Harbour's lead, and > I have no problem with a better way to handle the ace32.lib > issue, but we should be doing that with the new sources, not the old > ones. > > Shall I just upload the sources that I cannot yet get compiled > correctly and have everyone help get it going? > > -- > Brian Hays ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ xHarbour-developers mailing list xHarbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xharbour-developers
